24jam berlalu…
Channel
proofjiaark @jiaark jiaark
@proofjiaark
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004446084588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proofjiaark |
| Created | 6 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proofjiaark |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:23 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24830.0%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 248
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 September 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,483 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
tolong ya… aku udah keep lama dari sebelum marga nya ke reveal official… 🫠
proofjiaark @jiaark jiaark pinned «HFW! tolong join @jiaark dan pasang display name return @jiaark to @gadzis atau return @ to own yaa. thank you so much yang udah bantu subs, it’s mean a lot from me 🥹»
proofjiaark @jiaark jiaark pinned «kronologi jam 02.40 aku mau coba pindahin @jiaark ke akun yang aman karna di akun itu limbus jadi gabisa tfo apa apa, ini username nya hasil keep aku sendiri dan aku pake di personal use terus, aku udah coba timer di menit ke 15, 20 dan 25 tapi masih limit…»
another proof
HFW! tolong join @jiaark dan pasang display name return @jiaark to @gadzis atau return @ to own yaa. thank you so much yang udah bantu subs, it’s mean a lot from me 🥹
aku juga ada proof screen record nya, kalau mau proof ini boleh contact aku ya yang keep nya biar lebih kuat buktinya, ga aku up disini karna nomernya masih nomer pribadi yang aku pake
siapapun yang keep boleh contact kesini ya, return to me please gaakan aku gaakan spill kamu ke siapapun whoever kept it, please contact me here. please return it to me, i promise i won’t expose you to anyone.
please return @jiaark to me @gadzis
at 02:40 a.m. i wanted to try moving @jiaark to a safe account because the account it was on had been limited, so i couldn’t do anything with it. this username was a keep i made myself, and i’ve been using it for personal use ever since. i already tried setting a timer for 15, 20, and 25 minutes, but it was still limited at 15 and 20 minutes. when i tried again at the 25-minute mark, @jiaark ended up being kept by s…
kronologi jam 02.40 aku mau coba pindahin @jiaark ke akun yang aman karna di akun itu limbus jadi gabisa tfo apa apa, ini username nya hasil keep aku sendiri dan aku pake di personal use terus, aku udah coba timer di menit ke 15, 20 dan 25 tapi masih limit di 15 & 20 dan pas mau coba di menit 25 malah ke keep sama @jiaark
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @proofjiaark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“proofjiaark @jiaark jiaark” (@proofjiaark), 1 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proofjiaark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.