Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 67 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 534–579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 07:35
539
-4
3 Oct 2026, 08:15
543
-9
18 Sept 2026, 14:21
552
-5
9 Sept 2026, 10:21
557
-7
31 Aug 2026, 07:38
564
-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:05
566
-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:03
569
-4
8 Aug 2026, 06:08
573
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:48
574
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
574
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 28 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
651 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🥰
392
60.2%
👍
107
16.4%
❤
55
8.45%
🔥
43
6.61%
👏
39
5.99%
🌚
7
1.08%
👌
7
1.08%
🐳
1
0.154%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 651 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2023 to 28 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Listing Announcement📢
ProphetBots is now listed 💻📱
Trading Pair: $PROPHET/ETH
📈 Buy Tax: 0%
💼 Sell Tax: 0%
✅Contract:
0x443CAE5452c33Cf917dD90cC7312430d6d8Ea74C
✅Buy on:
app.uniswap.org/#/swap?&chain=mainnet&use=v2&outputCurrency=0x443CAE5452c33Cf917dD90cC7312430d6d8Ea74C
⚠️ Beware of scammers & fake CAs of bot attacks, our official contract is only in this message.
We thank you for your understanding and …
‼️ Calling all #influencers ‼️
⚡️ You're all invited to join our Goracle Network Ambassador Program
🌐 Elevate your influence, grow professionally, join the #GORAgang, and be rewarded for driving positive change in the world of Blockchain.
📌 How to apply:
https://t.co/mjgSjqOCl7
ProphetBots Verified Corporate KYC & DOX has been completed✅
In building a secure & safe foundation for our users, we felt this was the best way forward in working with @AssureDefi
You can confirm our completion here;
https://github.com/Assure-DeFi/KYC-Certificates/tree/main
Reflection Upon 'Launch' & Future Improvements 📝
We have taken absolutely everything on board & are making the necessary adjustments to assure everyone on transparency, communication & improvements.
Please read this tweet with our full statements on our upcoming launch & optimisations 📄
https://x.com/prophetbots/status/1698015655457349849?s=46
Hello all,
We have made the decision to push launch.
Upon investigation our CA was deployed ineffectively a few days ago, leading to many people (150+) snipers all prepared as soon as liquidity was added.
This didn't feel right.
The product is perfect. We didn't want an imperfect launch.
We are here to build in the space & become a genuine competitor in the Telegram Trading Bot scene. We haven't spent months & m…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @prophetbotannouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProphetBots Lounge 🔮” (@prophetbotannouncement), 539 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prophetbotannouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
