Channel
@provereno_kozhei
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,432subscribers
+143 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003941487019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @provereno_kozhei |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/provereno_kozhei |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 3,432 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 3,403 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 3,391 | +43 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 3,348 | +38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 3,310 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 3,300 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 3,289 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (23 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,655 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
294 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 205 | 69.7% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 15.3% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Капсульный крем VT Cosmetics PDRN Capsule Cream 100 VT у нас уже целый набор: крем для век, бустер, тонер. И это их выход в тему ПДРН — с зелёными капсулами внутри для красоты и эффекта. Разбираем, что под крышкой. Что обещают: повышает упругость, успокаивает раздражение и красноту, выравнивает тон, разглаживает морщины. Без отдушки, без липкости. Смотрим состав: ⚪️Ниацинамид. Шестой в составе — то есть в рабочей …
❤11👎11👍7
Гидрофильное масло PURITO From Green Cleansing Oil Четвёртая гидрофилка в нашей коллекции — после Anua, Abib и Round Lab. И самая скромная из всех: всего десять компонентов, из которых пять — просто масла. Разбираем этот минимализм. Что обещают: растворяет любой стойкий макияж, очищает поры и борется с чёрными точками, питает кожу и не оставляет жирной плёнки. Без минеральных масел, синтетических отдушек и спирта. …
❤45👍13👎3
Увлажняющий крем-гель Holika Holika Hyaluronic Hydra На упаковке — громкая цифра и слово «гипоаллергенный». Внутри — увлажнение и вопросы. Разбираем, за что тут платить тысячу рублей. Что обещают: лёгкая текстура, быстрое впитывание без липкости и жирности, наполнение кожи влагой изнутри. И гипоаллергенность. Состав: ⚪️Гиалуронка, 12 видов. Главная и, будем честны, единственная сила крема. Молекулы разных «размеро…
👎23❤10🔥2👍1
Сыворотка Dr. Althea Gentle Retinol Serum 0,1% — ретинол для тех, кто боится ретинола Ретинол с приставкой Gentle (нежный, деликатный). Обычно такие обещания вызывают скепсис, но здесь слово «деликатный» отработано на все 100. Разбираем. Что обещают: обновляет кожу, выравнивает текстуру и тон, сужает поры, уменьшает морщинки, повышает упругость. Заявлена как вариант для знакомства с ретиноидами. Смотрим состав: ⚪️…
❤57👍13👎3
Успокаивающие пэды Dr. Althea Stretchfit Calming Pad Эти пэды — и с необычной фишкой: они растягиваются как жвачка, до 15 см, чтобы облечь любой участок лица. Разбираем. Что обещают: увлажняют, укрепляют защитный слой, успокаивают раздражение и зуд, освежают и усмиряют жирный блеск. Что в составе: ⚪️Центелла в полной комплектации. Экстракт, экстракт листьев и все её ценные выжимки. Снимает красноту и помогает кож…
❤82👍11🔥2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @provereno_kozhei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Проверено кожей” (@provereno_kozhei), 3,432 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provereno_kozhei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.