Channel
@provitroart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,182subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001727518270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @provitroart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/provitroart |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 1,182 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 1,180 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 1,175 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 1,173 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:33 | 1,172 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,171 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 1,170 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 1,168 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,167 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,168 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,167 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 1,167 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
181 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 75.1% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.52% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.552% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На фото — фасадные окна Малого театра в Вильнюсе. Они сложены из пустотелых стеклянных кирпичей Фальконье. В 1902–1903 годах в этом здании устроили огромный зимний сад площадью около 400 м². Дневной свет проникал через арочные окна и цилиндрический стеклянный свод. Свод остался за кадром, но не упомянуть его невозможно: сегодня это один из двух подобных сооружений, сохранившихся в Европе. Второй находится в Праге. …
❤12👍4🔥2😢2
В этом месяце состоялась съемка на Невском, 62 — в бывшем здании Азовского и Русско-Азиатского банка (1896–1898, Б.И.Гиршович). В 2023 году, когда мы готовили книгу по Центральному району, дом стоял на ремонте, и попасть внутрь не удалось. Через три года пространство стало публичным: теперь здесь временно находится «Дом радио». Когда-то декоративного стекла в здании было много. Сохранилось мало, но ценное: окна па…
❤18🔥3😢1
Для исследователя искусства всегда важен контакт с подлинником. Витраж в окне почти всегда видишь издалека. Поэтому момент реставрации – исключительная возможность для изучения. Недавно я была в мастерской Александры Абеленцевой. Сейчас у нее в работе витражи из дома Хлебникова на Виленском пер., 6 (1907, арх. Б.И.Гиршович). При близком рассмотрении обнаружились интересные подробности. За каждым витражным модулем …
❤21🔥5
Не всякий узор на стекле создан человеком. Иногда его создает катастрофа. В мае 2023 года, обследуя фрамугу дома № 35 по 8-й Советской улице для проекта «Витражи Петербурга. Инвентаризация», я определила поверхность стёкол как «Мороз». На фотографиях она выглядела именно так. На прошедшей неделе активисты завершили расчистку этого витража. Работали 4 человека: Сергей Васильев, Александра Тесакова, Евгения Савельева…
❤25🔥4👍3
Подлинность нельзя воссоздать. Её можно сохранить или потерять навсегда. История дома на Введенской улице, 5/13 — лучшее тому доказательство. Когда дом был построен, его лестницы украшали витражи. К концу XX века их почти не осталось. Один витраж попал в музей. Другой в 2017 году выбросили на помойку — жители собирали его осколки среди мусора. Последний сохранившийся витраж удалось отстоять в 2023 году только благо…
❤19😁1
Посмотрите на фото. Я долго сомневалась, включать ли этот объект в каталог петербургских витражей. Ведь он связан не с архитектурой, а… с психиатрией. Съёмки в клинике на Боткинской, 17 состоялись в 2022 году, в самый разгар ковида. В кабинете В.М.Бехтерева нам показали эту металлическую раму с цветными стёклами. Я довольно долго искала исторические сведения об этой раме. И нашла! Оказалось, что это установка для ц…
❤22🔥9👍3👏1🤔1😁1
Проект «Витражи Петербурга. Инвентаризация»: миф и реальность Я мало пишу о нашей внутренней кухне. Из дефицита информации родился миф о нас как о «государственном фотопроекте». Это неверно дважды. Миф 1. «Проект государственный» Нет, мы общественная инициатива. Никто не получает зарплату, финансирования нет. Все работают за свой счет, в личное время и на энтузиазме. Миф 2. «Это просто фотопроект» Фотофиксация — н…
❤19🔥3👏1😁1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @provitroart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Витражи (Татьяна Княжицкая)” (@provitroart), 1,182 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provitroart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.