Channel
@provodnik9000
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003170630019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @provodnik9000 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/provodnik9000 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 157 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 156 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 155 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 157 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 157 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 17 | 39.5% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Быть вайбкодером престижно и модно. Даже вайбхудожники и вайбкомпозиторы пользуются каким-то спросом и уважением. Но если в приличном обществе заикнешься, что иногда вайбжурналистишь, на тебя брезгливо посмотрят и незаметно отойдут на шаг. Раздастся коллективный вздох, дамы схватятся за жемчуга и, может, у кого-то даже драматично выскользнет из рук бокал бесплатного просекко. Сгорбившись под тяжестью молчаливого осу…
😁2🤣1
Пиарщица поднимает CISO на панельную сессию с его участием во время Уралки
🤣2❤1💯1
"Код Дурова" уже не тот...
Все медиа сегодня отрабатывают классическое правило трёх «С» в журналистике: Сперма, Сдуров, Стерроризм.
🤣3
Пресс-релиз о доступе к методическим материалам в «Максе» (ранее известном как MAX) как стоячего обходит новости про Дурова и Telegram 30-го июля.
😁2❤1🤣1
Вайбкодеры типа такие...
😁2
А вы знали, что ебучие комары могут залетать в квартиры на 50-м этаже и даже выше? Эти маленькие пидорасы совсем не теряют тяги к жизни, когда потоки воздуха заносят их хуй знает куда, и даже наоборот – назло всему – становятся еще злее и с удовольствием ебут в поры каждого, кто им на такой высоте попадается. В душе не ебу как, но эти крылатые нагибаторы судьбы своим крошечным мозгом (он состоит из 200 тыс. клеток) …
❤1🔥1🤝1
Смартфоны/iPhone в ипотеку. Скоро. Скриньте.
Пярщики совсем писать разучились
🤣7
Кажется, про OpenAI и Hugging Face не написал только я. Пора… Постараюсь просто, наглядно, но умеренно точно. OpenAI решила проверить у себя GPT-5.6 Sol на хакерские навыки. Для проверки киберпреступных способностей ИИ давно есть одобренный всеми уважаемыми разработчиками бенчмарк ExploitGym. ExploitGym проверяет, как эффективно ИИ превращает найденные уязвимости в эксплойты. ИИ дают ПО с сотнями реальных уязвимост…
❤1👍1
В очередном приступе прокрастинации решил почитать про LLM’ки. Зацепился за историю архитектуры Transformer. Она стала прорывной, до сих пор доминирует, и т.д. и т.п. В общем, круто, веха, но про технину идите в "Неискусственный интеллект" читать. Меня как гуманитария заинтересовало другое. Архитектура Transformer выросла из научной статьи Attention Is All You Need, которую в 2017 году опубликовали восемь выходцев и…
❤2👍1
Он обычный журналист...🥲
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @provodnik9000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Проводник” (@provodnik9000), 157 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provodnik9000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.