Channel
@proyabloko2026
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
801subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001466598681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proyabloko2026 |
| Created | 25 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proyabloko2026 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 801 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 806 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 805 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 803 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 801 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 801 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 46.9% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 28.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кабардино-Балкария набирает темпы уборочной кампании ⚡ В республике продолжается активная уборка плодово-ягодной продукции. На сегодняшний день аграрии уже собрали около 14,5 тыс. тонн косточковых культур и ягод. 😋 Сейчас в самом разгаре сбор голубики. Основные промышленные плантации расположены в Чегемском, Урванском и Баксанском районах. Следующим этапом станет уборка раннелетних сортов семечковых культур. ⭐ По …
❤3
🍎 Розничные цены на яблоки продолжают расти Несмотря на снижение оптовых цен после выхода на рынок нового урожая, в рознице яблоки пока остаются на максимальных ценовых уровнях 2026 года. ➡️ По данным Росстата, на 27 июля средняя розничная цена составила 171,45 руб./кг, увеличившись на 1,1% за неделю, 2,3% за месяц и 3,6% за три месяца. Самые высокие цены зафиксированы в Дальневосточном федеральном округе (273,92 …
❤3👏2
Яблоки снова в числе продуктов с растущей ценой По данным АБ-Центр, на 27 июля 2026 года специалисты проанализировали динамику розничных цен на 43 продовольственных товара по данным Росстата. ➡️ За неделю цены выросли на 26 позиций, за месяц рост отмечался по 28 товарам, а за год подорожали 34 категории из 43. Среди продуктов, которые показали наиболее заметный рост за неделю, оказались яблоки: цена увеличилась на…
👍4❤3😁2
ЧТО ПРОИЗОЙДЕТ В САДУ 19 АВГУСТА? Как пройдет первый чемпионат России по уборке яблок? 🤩 Что произойдет в саду 19 августа? Команды получат реальную производственную задачу, а дальше начнется самое интересное: люди, техника, время, качество яблока и экономика одной тонны. 🟥 Разбираем APPLE HARVEST CHALLENGE по этапам. Листайте карусель! ☑️ Регистрация на чемпионат по ссылке
❤2👍2😁1
Крахмальный тест остается важным инструментом, но сегодня одного показателя уже недостаточно. DA-Meter, NIR-спектрометры, анализ этилена помогают точнее оценивать физиологическую зрелость яблока и выбирать оптимальное окно уборки. ✉️ Листайте карусель, разбираем технологии.
❤4👍3👌2🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @proyabloko2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO ЯБЛОКО | Выставка | Инсайды рынка садоводства” (@proyabloko2026), 801 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proyabloko2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.