6 measurements spanning 12 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,461–2,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 06:56
2,476
+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:26
2,473
+5
14 Aug 2026, 09:37
2,468
+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:15
2,464
+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:15
2,463
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:07
2,463
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 2,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
8 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
5,491
Reactions total
156
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
176 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👾
36
20.5%
🔥
36
20.5%
custom 5300776313768938074
20
11.4%
👍
18
10.2%
custom 5300801035600696454
15
8.52%
❤
15
8.52%
😁
9
5.11%
custom 5285461306499963828
6
3.41%
🐳
6
3.41%
⚡
4
2.27%
🤗
4
2.27%
🆒
3
1.70%
💯
2
1.14%
😎
2
1.14%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💻 Ровно 35 лет назад, в 1991 году, стал доступен первый в истории сайт
Его создал британский ученый Тим Бернерс-Ли на своем компьютере NeXT.
Сайт выглядел предельно просто (только текст и ссылки) и содержал описание новой технологии — World Wide Web (WWW). На нем были:
• объяснение концепции Всемирной паутины
• инструкции для пользователей, как создать собственную веб-страницу
• документация по протоколу HTTP, сист…
✨ Как превратить мобильное приложение ПСБ в одного из лидеров на рынке финтеха
Наш коллега Кирилл Маканков в своей статье на Хабре разбирает шесть системных потерь эффективности, которые мешают командам расти: от «кругов на воде» и ненужного рефакторинга до дублирования функционала и отсутствия четкого понимания процессов.
А также наглядно показывает, как контроль над эволюцией кода помогает сократить затраты на по…
📝 Президент России подписал закон о суверенном ИИ
Документ впервые закрепляет единые правила развития и применения ИИ:
🟣вводит определения «искусственный интеллект» и «большая фундаментальная модель»
🟣устанавливает принципы развития ИИ: технологический суверенитет, безопасность, соблюдение прав человека и уважение традиционных ценностей
🟣определяет два статуса ИИ-моделей:
суверенные — полностью российские разрабо…
➡️ Наш коллега Дмитрий Сухов подготовил подборку материалов для экспертов, которые занимаются автоматизацией тестирования.
Они не теряют актуальности и помогают сформировать профессиональную базу. Листайте карточки!
💿 «Карат» звучит как секретный проект из научной фантастики.
В публикациях его иногда называют чуть ли не «советским искусственным интеллектом для управления реактором». Обычно в таких историях фигурируют автономный контроль мощности, сложные алгоритмы принятия решений и другие детали, которые хорошо смотрятся в ретроспективе.
💎Реальность интереснее. «Карат» действительно был одной из первых вычислительных систем, …
🎮 Финальное испытание открыто
Пятница в ИТ — это момент, когда кажется, что все задачи почти закрыты… И именно тогда может появиться «финальный босс»!
Подготовили мини-викторину для всех коллег — без разницы, пишете вы код, тестируете, анализируете требования, работаете с данными, инфраструктурой или продуктами.
🎯 Попробуйте угадать — какой вариант самый коварный.
Пишите ответ в комментариях — проверим, какой про…
🎢 У каждого в блоке ИТ ПСБ свой карьерный путь
Рассказываем историю нашего коллеги Давида Саргсяна о том, как не бояться неизвестности, брать на себя ответственность и выстраивать процессы с нуля.
Он пришел в ИТ случайно, но с твердым намерением остаться. С тех пор прошел путь от джуниора до главного системного аналитика, сменил две компании и стал связующим звеном между бизнесом и разработкой.
📤 Читайте в карточк…
🔥8custom 53007763137689380745🤗4👍3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @psblabdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПСБ @psbbank · 86,739 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИТ ПСБ” (@psblabdigital), 2,476 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psblabdigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
