Channel
@psirtejalk124
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
567subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001435839040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psirtejalk124 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psirtejalk124 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 567 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 568 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 566 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 566 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The daily answer writing is a very effort taking exercise. We don't use AI. Neither we copy paste. Any student who feels like that has the choice to leave the channel. Every answer is curated with flow and research. My key focus has always been only on serious students who really want quality in approach towards answer writing and not crowded audiences. This poll is very key for any other free initiative. If you r…
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Does the free answer writing program provide consistency, value addition and better answer writing linkages in your PSIR preparation?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Hello everyone! In the voting polls, we observed non participation of students in answer writing. I will put a poll today. If it's a substantial number, we will continue the free answer writing. Or we will launch Paid programs for interested students only.
👍5
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Question of the day: 2nd July 2026 What is the Marxist and liberal approach towards the state? On what grounds the theoretical differences between them are premised? Explain. (20M) Question Two: Examine the liberal theory of state in contemporary politics.(20M)
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Question of the day: 1st July 2026 Provide a comparative analysis of behavioural and institutional approach to the study of Political theory (20M)
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Apologies for the backlog. Please try to write for the missed four days. Will update approach of all these questions answers soon. Keep writing. We will be regular everyday tomorrow onwards. Best wishes, Tejal Khandelwal Study Centre
❤2
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Question of the day: 27th June 2026 Human rights are a complex and contested social practice that organizes relations between individuals, society and the State. Comment. (15M) Question of the day: 28th June 2026 Do you think that legitimacy acquired by consent or manufactured by indoctrination is an essential element in the maintenance of political rule? Justify your answer with relevant examples. (15M) Questio…
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
This question is a PYQ. It is a interpretation based question and since students are used to copy pasting notes of institutions, they face highest challenges in such types of statements based questions. Here the key formula is to find the key concept amongst so many given concepts like democracy, citizenship, liberty and equality. However the emphasis in this question is on Equality in all these components. So we h…
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
The nature of the relationship between equality of democratic citizenship and liberty of citizens is influenced by economic equality. Comment. (15M) Approach of answer The evolution of human society is the story of evolution of equality. Among all the normative ideals ,it stands apart because it is linked with human dignity. Unlike ancient notion of Aristotle that points " Treating Equals equally, unequals unequall…
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Are you attempting questions given as per daily answer writing?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Question of the day: 26th June 2026 The nature of the relationship between equality of democratic citizenship and liberty of citizens is influenced by economic equality. Comment. (15M) Question two: The debate on human rights is caught between the limitations of both universalism and cultural relativism. Comment. (20M)
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Explain how Rawls used the liberal and egalitarian perspective to develop his theory of Justice. (15M) Approach of answer Justice is the central and commanding concept of current mainstream normative political philosophy. Rawls theory of justice revived interest in political philosophy. It is a practical contribution to resolving the long standing tension between liberty and equality. Rawls theory of justice as fa…
😁1
Signed Tejal Khandelwal
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psirtejalk124. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Does the free answer writing program provide consistency, value addition and better answer writing linkages in your PSIR preparation?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are you attempting questions given as per daily answer writing?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TEJAL KHANDELWAL STUDY CENTRE : PSIR, GS PII, ESSAY” (@psirtejalk124), 567 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psirtejalk124.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.