Channel
@psirwallah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,041subscribers
+250 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003960902836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psirwallah |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psirwallah |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 4,041 | +26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 4,015 | +18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 3,997 | +38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 3,959 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 3,948 | +16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,932 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 3,911 | +34 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 3,877 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 3,864 | +26 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 3,838 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 3,820 | +22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 3,798 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 3,791 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
238 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 230 | 96.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.68% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.84% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aristotle warned that political systems cease to be virtuous when public office becomes an instrument of private advantage rather than public good. Defection exemplifies office being treated as private property. Connecting scholars • Kautilya: A ruler's legitimacy, his rajdharma ultimately hinges on maintaining the confidence and trust of the populace. • Machiavelli: Machiavelli warned that systematically destroying …
❤21
Core theme of article from PSIR perspective - Political defections unilaterally rewrite the implicit social contract between voters and representatives. Rather than hurting the losing Opposition, the primary casualty is the voter, whose vote is reduced from a democratic choice to a tradable political commodity.
❤15✍1
In conclusion India must continually diversify its energy security routes and maintain robust, independent diplomatic channels in West Asia. As we can see that when the global superpower behaves unpredictably, regional stability cannot be outsourced, and middle powers like India must support international law and freedom of navigation to protect their economic security.
❤13😍1
analysis of this article from psir perspective We can analyse this by connecting to the following scholars and dimensions Robert Keohane and Hegemonic Stability Theory. Keohane argued that a hegemon is required to sustain global order and public goods. This analysis shows the decline of this stabilising capacity. When a hegemon resorts to raw, un-nuanced military force without institutional consensus, it breeds insta…
❤12
connecting psir scholars and theories to this article analysis of the article - key argument is that states must employ anticipatory statecraft, which effectively means the capacity to foresee, shape, and institutionalise the rules of tomorrow's global governance before they harden into restrictive frameworks. China is attempting to create new international regimes in AI and space to set standards that lock in its …
❤18
🔥 PSIR Snapshot: Terrorism's "Data Retreat" - Fewer Attacks, Deeper Threats 🔥
❤8
Understanding the article Important article discusses various dimensions of power operate. How Iran uses funeral as a political tool to project power while not being powerful. Provides dimension of Constructivism and state power in action. Article has various dimensions It shows the difference between symbols that express power and symbols that substitute for it. In Post-Structuralism, power is not just military har…
❤18
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
🔥PSIR Snapshot : Is the Right to Vote a Fundamental Right?🔥
❤7
Analysis of the article We can connect key arguments with the following scholars 1. John Mearsheimer’s theory of offensive realism, which notes that great powers face severe limits in projectable power over distant regions. The failure of the US to achieve its stated political objectives highlights the limits of military hegemony in an anarchic world order. 2. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye’s framework from Power and…
❤19
🔥 PSIR Snapshot : Four Geopolitical Shifts from the Iran Conflict 🔥
❤8👍3
Connecting this topic with PSIR theoretical dimension along with ethics. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach can be connected straight to this article. True freedom depends on institutional capabilities. If a citizen chooses to die because they cannot afford palliative care or pain relief, it represents a structural failure of distributive justice by the State.
❤21🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psirwallah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSIR by PWOnlyIAS” (@psirwallah), 4,041 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psirwallah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.