Channel
@psixolog_nasirov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,615subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001970918028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psixolog_nasirov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psixolog_nasirov |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 1,615 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,629 | -13 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,642 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 1,647 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 1,654 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,657 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,659 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 81 | 43.1% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 5.85% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.532% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bugun o‘zingizdan bir narsani so‘rab ko‘ring: «Agar men xato qilish huquqiga ega bo‘lsam, hayotimda nimani boshqacha qilgan bo‘lardim?» Chunki sizning qadringiz qanchalik mukammal ekaningiz bilan emas, inson sifatidagi o‘zingiz bilan belgilanadi. 🤍 Mukammallik ortidan quvib, o‘zingizga nisbatan shafqatsiz bo‘lib qolmang. Ba’zan «yetarlicha yaxshi» — haqiqatan ham yetarli. 🦋
❤7
Perfeksionizm shunchaki «men sifatni yaxshi ko‘raman» degani emas. Ba’zan uning ortida: — xato qilishdan qo‘rqish; — tanqid qilinishdan qo‘rqish; — boshqalarning fikriga haddan tashqari bog‘lanish; — «men yetarlicha yaxshi emasman» degan ichki ishonch yotadi. Shuning uchun perfeksionist odam o‘zidan juda ko‘p narsani talab qiladi. Yaxshi natija — yetarli emas. A’lo natija — ham yetarli emas. Mukammal bo‘lishi kera…
👍5
Siz ham hamma narsani mukammal qilishga harakat qilasizmi? Ishingizda xato bo‘lsa, uzoq vaqt o‘ylab yurasizmi? Biror narsani boshlashdan oldin: «Buni juda yaxshi qilishim kerak» deb o‘zingizga bosim berasizmi? Hatto yaxshi natijaga erishganingizdan keyin ham: «Bundan ham yaxshiroq qilishim mumkin edi» deb o‘ylaysizmi? Agar javobingiz «ha» bo‘lsa, sizda perfeksionizmga moyillik bo‘lishi mumkin.
Oilaga g‘amxo‘rlik qilasiz — lekin o‘zingizni unutmasdan. Farzandingiz uchun yashaysiz — lekin o‘zingizning xohishlaringizni ham yo‘qotmasdan. Ishlaysiz — lekin hayotingiz faqat ishdan iborat bo‘lmasdan. Masalan, oilangizga mazali ovqat tayyorlash sizga yoqsa, bu ham o‘zingiz uchun bo‘lishi mumkin. Ammo har kuni ichingizdan “yana menmi?” deb, majburlik bilan qilayotgan bo‘lsangiz, bu boshqa masala. Gap ishni qilis…
👏5❤3👍2
Lekin o‘ylab ko‘rsak, o‘zi “o‘zim uchun yashash” nima? Faqat dam olishmi? Ko‘proq uxlashmi? Sayohat qilishmi? Hech kimning gapiga qaramasdan, faqat o‘zing xohlagan narsani qilishmi? Menimcha, bu faqat shular emas. Ba’zan “o‘zim uchun yashash” degani — hayotingizdagi hamma narsani tashlab ketish emas. Aksincha, o‘zingizni ham shu hayotning ichiga qo‘shish.
🔥12
“O‘zim uchun yashash” deganda nimani tushunamiz? Bu gapni ko‘p eshitamiz: “Endi o‘zim uchun yashagim keladi.” “Hammaga g‘amxo‘rlik qilishdan charchadim.” “Bir marta bo‘lsa ham o‘zimni o‘ylagim keladi.” Fikringizni yozing 👇
❤4
Bolaning o‘zini past baholashining sabablari Bola “men boshqalardan yomonman” degan fikr bilan tug‘ilmaydi. Ko‘pincha bu tasavvur atrofidagi munosabatlar ta’sirida shakllanadi. Eng ko‘p uchraydigan sabablar: 🔹 Doimiy tanqid “Sen hech narsani to‘g‘ri qilolmaysan”, “Qara, boshqalar qanday” kabi gaplar bola o‘ziga ishonchini pasaytiradi. 🔹 Boshqalar bilan solishtirish “Akan sendan yaxshi”, “Falonchining bolasi 5 ola…
❤5👍3😁1
Va yana bir muhim narsa: yaxshi inson ham xato qiladi, yomon inson esa doim yomon ko‘rinib yurmaydi. Shuning uchun odamni bir vaziyat bilan emas, takrorlanadigan xatti-harakatlari bilan baholagan ma’qul. Eng yaxshi “test” esa — vaqt, chegaralar va manfaatlar to‘qnashuvi. Odamning asl fe’li ko‘pincha aynan siz unga “yo‘q” deganingizda, u sizdan foyda ko‘rmay qolganda yoki sizning manfaatlaringiz uning manfaatiga to‘…
❤3👍3🔥3
Insonning yaxshi yoki yomonligini birgina gapiga yoki tashqi ko‘rinishiga qarab aniqlash qiyin. Odamni vaqt va turli vaziyatlardagi xatti-harakatlari ko‘proq ko‘rsatadi. Ayniqsa mana shu narsalarga e’tibor bering: Sizdan hech narsa kerak bo‘lmaganda qanday munosabatda bo‘ladi? O‘zidan kuchsiz yoki foydasi tegmaydigan odamlarga qanday muomala qiladi? Siz “yo‘q” deganingizda chegarangizni hurmat qiladimi? Xato qil…
👍5👏3
Nega oilada hamma narsani ayol ko‘tarishi kerak? Uy, farzandlar, ovqat, qarindoshlar, ish, ro‘zg‘or… Ayol bularning hammasini bajarib, yana: «Nega charchading?» degan savolni eshitishi mumkin. Ayolning charchashi — uning kuchsizligi emas. Doim kuchli bo‘lishga majbur bo‘lgan inson ham bir kuni: «Men ham e’tibor, yordam va mehrga muhtojman», deyishi mumkin. Oilada vazifalar faqat «erkakniki» va «ayolniki» deb bo‘…
👍11❤6👏3
Ba’zida insonga maslahat ham kerak emas. Unga faqat: «Men seni tushundim.» «Bu senga qanchalik og‘ir bo‘lganini tasavvur qilyapman.» «Men seni eshityapman.» degan so‘zlar kerak bo‘ladi. ❤️ Chunki insonni eshitish — uning gaplarini qulog‘imiz bilan qabul qilish emas. Uni his qilishga harakat qilishdir. Siz oxirgi marta kimnidir shunchaki javob berish uchun emas, chin dildan tushunish uchun qachon tinglagansiz?
❤11❤🔥3
Ba’zan esa insonning o‘z og‘rig‘i uning qulog‘ini yopib qo‘yadi. 🔹 O‘zi tushunilmagan inson boshqasini tushunishga qiynaladi. 🔹 Ichida alam yig‘ilib qolgan inson oddiy gapni ham hujumdek qabul qilishi mumkin. 🔹 O‘zini himoya qilishga o‘rganib qolgan inson suhbatni tinglash emas, o‘zini oqlashga aylantiradi. 🔹 «Men haqman» degan ehtiyoj esa «Seni tushunaman» degan imkoniyatni yo‘qqa chiqaradi. Shuning uchun ba’zi mu…
❤4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psixolog_nasirov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alisher Nasirov” (@psixolog_nasirov), 1,615 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psixolog_nasirov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.