Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psixologik bilimlar

Channel

Psixologik bilimlar

@psixologikbilimlar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,139subscribers

-101 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412603336
TypeChannel
Username@psixologikbilimlar
Created11 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psixologikbilimlar

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1395,2405,189.56 August 2026 — 5,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,221 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,223 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,209 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,197 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,173 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,167 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,162 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,159 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,155 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,151 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,139 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,124–5,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 18:175,139-12
13 Sept 2026, 04:195,151-4
9 Sept 2026, 12:425,155-4
4 Sept 2026, 11:175,159-3
1 Sept 2026, 05:065,162-5
29 Aug 2026, 09:225,167-6
26 Aug 2026, 01:295,173-24
22 Aug 2026, 16:265,197-12
16 Aug 2026, 20:435,209-14
13 Aug 2026, 12:185,223+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:165,221-17
7 Aug 2026, 02:535,238-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:045,240first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 26 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3869.1%
👍1323.6%
👏23.64%
😁23.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC266 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

UNIVERSITETGA KIRA OLMASLIK HAYOTINGIZGA NUQTA QO'YDIMI? Qizaloq necha yillab tayyorlandi, ammo orzuidagi universitetga kira olmadi. Hozir hamma "endi nima qilasan?", "qachon turmushga chiqasan?" deb so'raydi. O'zini butunlay omadsizdek his qilyapti, kelajagi yo'qdek tuyulyapti. Shu bosim ostida o'ziga bo'lgan ishonchi pasaygan. 😔 Unutmang, universitet diplomidan ham muhimroq narsalar bor: sizning mahoratingiz, qiz

2👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC351 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TELEFONNI QO'YA OLMASLIGINGIZ SHUNCHAKI IRODASIZLIK EMAS! 🤔 • Dars qilish, ishga kirishish o'rniga telefon varaqlayapsiz. Bu og'ir vazifadan qochish, miya oson dopamin qidiradi. Yechim: Ishni 5 daqiqalik bo'laklarga bo'lib, telefonni boshqa xonaga qo'yib, bittasini bajaring. • "Bugun qilaman" deb, baribir kechiktirasiz. Ko'pincha bu "yaxshi bajara olmasamchi?" degan qo'rquvdan. Yechim: Vazifani yozing. Boshlashdan

11 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC400 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

XAVOTIRIM HAQIQATMI YOKI MIYAMNING O'YINIMI? Tunda o'tmishni o'ylab, yoki kelajakdan "yomon narsalar" kutib uyqu qochyaptimi? "Yaqinlarim norozi bo'lmasmikin?", "Imtihondan yiqilmasmikin?" kabi xayollar tinchlik bermayaptimi? 😔 Har bir xavotir real muammo emas. Amaliy mashq: Qog'ozga barcha xavotirlarni yozing. Yoniga: "Bu hozir hal qilsam bo'ladigan muammomi?" Agar "ha" bo'lsa, "Birinchi qadamim nima?" Agar "yo'q"

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC463 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TASHQI KO'RINISHINGIZGA QARSHI HAZILLAR OG'IR BOTADIMI? Ko‘chada, ishda yoki hatto yaqinlar davrasida "ozib ketibsanu", "yuzingga nima qildi" kabi "hazillar" eshitish tanish holat. Ba'zida bu gaplar shunchalik ta'sir qiladiki, odamlar oldiga chiqishga, kamerani yoqishga ham tortinasiz. Lekin sizning qadringiz, aql-idrokingiz tashqi ko‘rinishingiz bilan o‘lchanmaydi. • Bilib qo‘ying: Ko‘pincha bunday "hazillar"ni ayt

3👍2

10 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC483 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DO'STLAR FAQAT KERAK BO'LGANDA ESLAYDIGAN HOLAT TANISHMI? Yaqin do'stingizga doim yordam berasiz. Lekin ishi bitgach, u sizdan uzoqlashib, faqat yana biror yumush tushganda eslaydi. Bu holatdan charchadingizmi? 🤔 BUNDAY DEMANG: 'Ular faqat o'z manfaatini o'ylaydi, qadriga yetmaydigan do'stlarim bor.' BUNDAY DENG: 'Men chin do'stlikni qadrlayman. Munosabatlar ikki tomonlama bo'lishini va o'zaro hurmatni istayman.'

2

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC570 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DANGASA DEYISH O'RNIGA NIMA QILISH KERAK? "O'g'lim abituriyent, darsga qaramaydi. Jahl ustida 'Qachon odam bo'lasan, dangasa?!' dedim." Bunday yorliqlar bolaning o'ziga ishonchini sindirib, uni sizdan uzoqlashtiradi. Yechim: Shaxsiyatiga emas, xatti-harakatiga murojaat qiling. "Darslaringga kamroq vaqt ajratayotganing meni kelajaging haqida xavotirga soladi. Nima bo'lyapti, gaplashsak bo'ladimi?" Shu orqali tinglas

10 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC528 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

YORDAM SO'RASH KUCHSIZLIK ALOMATIMI? Ko'pincha "Kuchli odam hech qachon yordam so'ramaydi" degan noto'g'ri tushuncha bizni qiynaydi. Aslida, insonning chegaralari bor. Doimiy stressdan keyin "yeb qo'ydim" deyish, yoki imtihon oldidan do'stdan tushuntirish so'rash — kuchsizlik emas, balki vaziyatni to'g'ri baholashdir. Yordam so'rash o'z-o'ziga g'amxo'rlik qilish va muammoni hal etishga bo'lgan chinakam xohishni ko'r

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC525 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

MUNOSABATDA DOIM MEN KECHIRIM SO'RAYAPMANMI? 🤔 Munosabatlarda doim siz birinchi bo'lib kechirim so'raysizmi, hattoki ayb faqat sizda bo'lmasa ham? Bu muvozanatsizlik hissi ichki norozilikni keltirib chiqaradi. Aslida, mas'uliyatni teng baham ko'rish muhim. O'zingizni xafa his qilganingizni muloyimlik bilan bildirish, vaziyatni o'zgartirishga yordam beradi. Tayyor jumlalar: • "Men ham bu holatda xafa bo'ldim. Keling

9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC559 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HISSIYOTGA BERILMASLIKNING OSON YO'LI Nafas oling va kuzating. Hissiyotlar kuchayganda, bir zumga to'xtab, chuqur nafas oling. Hissiyotni tana hissi sifatida kuzating, uni tahlil qilmang, shunchaki borligini tan oling. Keyin hissiyotni nomlang: "Men hozir g'azabni his qilyapman" yoki "Xavotir meni qamrab olmoqda". Psixologiyada bu "affektni nomlash" (affect labeling) deb ataladi. Tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, his

9 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ONGNI TINCHLANTIRISH SIRI Ko'pincha xayollarimiz o'tmish yoki kelajakda kezib yuradi. Bu esa bezovtalik va stressni keltirib chiqarishi mumkin. 😔 Kichik mashq: Kundalik yumushlardan birini bajarayotganda (masalan, ovqatlanayotganda, choy ichayotganda yoki yuvinayotganda) bor e'tiboringizni faqat bitta his-tuyg'uga qarating. Suvning tovushini, choyning ta'mini yoki oyoqlaringiz yerga tegishini ongli ravishda his qil

👍1

9 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC573 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TINGLASH SAN'ATI: MUNOSABATLARNI MUSTAHKAMLAYMIZ Ko'pincha suhbatdoshimizni eshitishdan ko'ra, unga javob berishga shoshilamiz. Bu munosabatlarda tushunmovchiliklarga sabab bo'lishi mumkin. Haqiqiy tinglash – bu faqat so'zlarni eshitish emas, balki his-tuyg'ularni va aytilmagan xabarlarni ham ilg'ay olish demakdir. Suhbatdoshingizga to'liq e'tibor qarating, uning fikrlarini hurmat qiling. Bu oddiy qoida muloqotingiz

1

9 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC559 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TUGALLANMAGAN ISHLAR MIYAMIZDA NEGA UZOQ QOLADI? Hech e'tibor berganmisiz, bajarilmay qolgan vazifalar yoki tugatishga ulgurmagan rejalar miyamizdan chiqmaydi? Bu psixologiyada "Zaygarnik effekti" deb ataladi. Bizning ongimiz tugallanmagan ishlarni eslab qolishga moyil bo'ladi, chunki u ularni yakunlashga undaydi. Bu effektni o'z manfaatingizga ishlating: murakkab vazifani boshlashdan oldin uni kichik qismlarga bo'l

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @psixologikbilimlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psixologik bilimlar” (@psixologikbilimlar), 5,139 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psixologikbilimlar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.