.

Channel
UCKART MPPS
@psuckart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001762952385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psuckart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 22 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psuckart |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2023 to 1 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
.
.
.
.
.
Sticker, posted without a caption
︎ ︎ PARTNERSHIP ÜCKART (28) ═════════════════════ O1. $ $ O2. $ $ O3. $ $ O4. $ $ O5. $ $ O6. $ $ O7. $ $ O8. $ $ O9. $ $ 1O. $ $ ═════════════════════
Sticker, posted without a caption
︎ ︎ PARTNERSHIP ÜCKART (27) ═════════════════════ O1. $ $ O2. $ $ O3. $ $ O4. $ $ O5. $ $ O6. $ $ O7. $ $ O8. $ $ O9. $ $ 1O. $ $ ═════════════════════
Sticker, posted without a caption
︎ ︎ PARTNERSHIP ÜCKART (26) ═════════════════════ O1. 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐓𝐑𝐕𝐄𝐙𝐄𝐍 $ @OFCTRVEZEN $ @TRVEZENPART_BOT O2. Ø𝐅𝐂 𝐑𝐄𝐕Ø𝐋𝐒 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊 $ @REVOLSGANK $ @KAWANREVOLSBOT O3. 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐁𝐔𝐑 $ @OFCEXCALIBUR $ @PSEXCBOT O4. JORMUNGADR $ @JORMUNGADROFC $ @mppsjormungadrBOT O5. 𝐁'𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐋𝐔𝐗𝐄 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘 (libur) $ @BVERSLUXEOFC $ @MPPSBVSABOT O6. ℂ𝔸ℝ𝔾𝕆ℕ𝔼𝕊𝕀𝔸 $ @OFCCARGONESIA $ @pscargonesia_bot O7…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psuckart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@JORMUNGADROFC · 1802 posts𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐀𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐒
@AIMILIOSOFC · 991 poststay keep.
@AsclepeionHospital · 11 postKeep
@AsclepeionKindergarten · 11 postKeep.
@AsclepeionPaket · 11 postbubar
@bbqofc · 8561 postPINDAH
@BPCITYSQ · 11 postP keep
@CyberFerocious_OFC · 41 postBUBAR | 𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗥
@DPRMARINER · 1,4491 postPOSTER FRECTION
@FRECTIONAREA · 1,4431 post.
@HSRiverdale · 3271 postNorea
@JENOAREAOFC · 21 post139.K-JNTHV WAS FINISH
@KJNTHVOFC · 1,7901 postPSTORE INDONESIA 🇮🇩
@KURIEROEXPRESS · 841 post𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐒𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐍 𝐕𝐄𝐂𝐇𝐓𝐄𝐍
@ofc_samenvechten · 271 postKeep dgl
@OFCDENGELGANK · 31 postkeep
@OFCDEXVONGKER · 11 postPERFECCIÓN BANGTAN
@ofcperfeccionbangtan · 71 postOFC RIGEL
@ofcrigelsq · 2351 postVIGOROUS ARSIP
@OFCVIGOROUSS · 81 postUVT FOREVER
@OFFICIALUVT · 1,7091 postBUBAR & KEEP THE ID
@RESIDENTVROJK · 11 postØ𝐅𝐂—𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐋𝐒 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊
@REVOLSGANK · 15,4411 post🄣HEY: VANDERICK ORGANIZER.
@VNEORGANIZER · 1,5481 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 35
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 35
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@psuckart named 35 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“UCKART MPPS” (@psuckart). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psuckart.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.