Channel
@psyapp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,866subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001614199475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyapp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyapp |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 3,866 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 3,873 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 3,876 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 3,885 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 3,887 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 3,884 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 3,886 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 3,889 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 3,891 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 3,895 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 3,896 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 3,900 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 3,902 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Завтра многие получат ответы, которые искали годами. А кто-то снова скажет себе: "Потом посмотрю..." Обычно именно с этого "потом" и начинается ещё один год без изменений. Мы привыкли искать новую диету, новое меню, новую систему питания. Но почти никогда не задаём себе главный вопрос: "Почему мой организм вообще сопротивляется похудению?" Пока вы не знаете ответ на этот вопрос, любая новая попытка может законч…
https://t.me/moviepsyanalysis
🃏 Что делать, когда клиент говорит: — «Я не понимаю, что чувствую…» — «Не могу объяснить, что со мной происходит…» В такие моменты одного разговора бывает недостаточно. Именно поэтому всё больше психологов используют проективные методики — метафорические ассоциативные карты (МАК) и карты Таро как инструмент психологического консультирования. ❗️Важно: речь не о предсказаниях. Карты помогают мягко обойти внутреннее…
Photo, posted without a caption
Можно ли научиться клиническому мышлению? Можно выучить техники. Можно запомнить алгоритмы. Можно прочитать десятки книг по КПТ. Но это не гарантирует, что на консультации вы увидите главное. Потому что техники — это инструменты. А клиническое мышление — это умение понимать, что происходит с ребёнком на самом деле. Именно поэтому два психолога после одной консультации могут прийти к совершенно разным выводам. …
Photo, posted without a caption
https://t.me/moviepsyanalysis
Вы когда-нибудь замечали одну странную вещь? Два человека могут есть практически одинаково. Один остаётся стройным годами. Другой всю жизнь считает калории, начинает новую диету каждый понедельник — и вес всё равно возвращается. Почему? Потому что лишний вес — это далеко не всегда история про еду. Иногда организм буквально не даёт худеть. Он включает механизмы защиты. Замедляет обмен веществ. Провоцирует пос…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Большинство начинающих специалистов думают, что главное в КПТ — то, что происходит на сессии. Но опытный КПТ-терапевт знает: нередко исход терапии решается между встречами. Именно там ребёнок сталкивается с реальной жизнью. Именно там становится понятно, работает ли техника, удалось ли сформировать новый навык, подтвердились ли гипотезы психолога. Поэтому домашнее задание в КПТ — это не приложение к терапии. Это е…
Photo, posted without a caption
«Это пройдёт с возрастом». Фраза, которая иногда стоит ребёнку нескольких потерянных лет. Трёхлетка устраивает истерики — это нормально. ✅ Пятилетний ребёнок боится темноты — тоже. ✅ Подросток спорит с родителями — вполне закономерно. ✅ Но где проходит граница между возрастной особенностью и началом психического расстройства? Именно здесь ошибаются даже специалисты. Представьте. 🔹 Семилетний ребёнок отказывае…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psyapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия Психологии и Психотерапии” (@psyapp), 3,866 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.