Жизнь человека можно представить через смену времён года. Бывают периоды, когда мы цветём, придумываем, мечтаем и верим, что нам всё по силам. А бывают такие, когда внутри будто наступает зима: ничего не хочется, привычные вещи требуют огромных усилий, и даже забота о себе становится непростой задачей. И мне захотелось написать об этом стихотворение. Кажется, мы часто требуем от себя вечного лета - продуктивности,…

Channel
Записки между встречами ❤️🩹
@psychologist_adriaksar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002568822072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychologist_adriaksar |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychologist_adriaksar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:58 | 37 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:22 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 12 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 101.4%
- avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 37.5
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.52%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 October 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 600 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 77.8% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Немного с личной терапии: - Ты настолько многогранна! Ты бриллиант, нет, даже у него нет такого количества граней! Зачем же ты выбираешь для себя только одну? - я её люблю - А какая она? - умная, дерзкая, независимая, сильная… опорная - А если к ней добавить вторую? Какую-нибудь из тех, что ты подавляешь? - они конфликтуют - Или ты конфликтуешь с ними? - а может, и я. На самом деле я знаю свои грани. Просто …
💔2❤1
Если бы я был привязан к Слову Божьему во все времена одинаково и всегда имел к нему такую любовь и желание, как иногда имею, тогда я должен был бы считать себя самым благословенным человеком на земле. Но любящий апостол, св. Павел, потерпел неудачу и здесь, так как он сетует с воздыханиями, говоря: “В членах моих вижу иной закон, противоборствующий закону ума моего”. Должно ли Слово быть ложным, потому что оно не вс…
❤2
Какой ты сегодня диагноз по МКБ10?
Сегодня решила совершить забег по столичным (и не только) улочкам в поиске места для чтения и наслаждения прекрасным днем в уединении с собой, мыслями и природой 🍂 Назаземлялась на славу 🙂
❤2
«Продолжение саги о зеленом цвете, в виде новых штор, и пушистый прораб»
Уважаемые клиенты и просто подписочники, моя первая цель в йоге достигнута! Если дальше я не выйду на связь - я свернула шею на следующих целях 🙂
❤2
Заботимся о теле, а тело заботится о нас. Не вместо психологической поддержки, а вместе с ней ❤️🩹 Немного из личного опыта: я могу работать по 5–7 часов в день, и если не делаю хотя бы минимальную растяжку, у меня начинает отваливаться спина. Спина болит, я раздражаюсь, начинаю циклиться на боли вместо работы. Отвлекаюсь на своё состояние и тут же включается внутренний критик: «Какой же ты хороший терапевт, если да…
❤1
Прошу не завидовать… 🤭
❤1
Обнаружила для себя, что выстраивать близость с нуля во взрослой жизни это, конечно, ебануться какая сложная задачка 😢 Мало встретить своего человека, с которым хочется делиться жизнью. Нужно ещё совпасть графиками, найти время на созвон, переписку или совместный просмотр фильма. И желательно, чтобы к этому моменту у обоих оставались силы быть людьми, а не просто лежать и смотреть в стену. Я сейчас работаю 30 часов…
😭2
Video message, posted without a caption
Автор сильно радуется в кружке:
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psychologist_adriaksar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки между встречами ❤️🩹” (@psychologist_adriaksar), 37 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychologist_adriaksar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.