☺Психология личности😭
😁4

Channel
@psyhopipl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
703subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002042194958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyhopipl |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyhopipl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 703 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 703 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 44.8% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 25.9% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 16.4% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 4.31% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☺Психология личности😭
😁4
Наверное все слышали такую мудрость: "Бог создал всех талантливыми в чем-то" Если оно так, то глупо не использовать свой талант если ты знаешь в чем он Увы, зачастую люди ждут пока всё потеряют, чтобы начать его использовать, но лучше использовать его сразу, если талант очевиден Но сама понимаешь, человек птица гордая, пока не пнёшь — не полетит 🤷♂️ Ты не знаешь в чем твой талант? Ищи его, он есть у всех ❤️ — …
❤6
Я считаю, что отдаление — это неизбежный этап большинства отношений. Увы, жизнь нельзя поставить на паузу, романтика угасает, конфликты копятся, а еще работа, заботы, стрессы. Это нормально. Вы почувствовали, что близость угасла? Это вовсе не приговор вашим отношениям. Всё можно вернуть, главное – понять, почему вы отдалились! Вам было интересно? Ставьте ❤️ буду рада поговорить с вами ещё! ☺Психология личности😭
❤1
☺Психология личности😭
❤1👍1🥰1
☺Психология личности😭
❤1👍1🔥1
Как вы считаете, если партнеры отдалились друг от друга, это приговор отношениям или этап который нужно пережить? Завтра я поделюсь своим личным мнением! ☺Психология личности😭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💥Собаки или кошки? Давно доказано, что кошатницы и собачницы — абсолютно разные девушки на психологическом уровне! Собачницы до мозга костей экстравертки! Любят общаться, доверять и сострадать, их дисциплина на высоте, целеустремленность на максималке! А вот кошатницы наоборот, тихие интровертки... Круг общения узкий, зато интеллект прокачан, склонны к депрессиям и переменам настроения, но не смотря на все это обо…
❤13🔥8
☺Психология личности😭
🔥4❤1👍1
☺Психология личности😭
😁2❤1👻1🔥1
Есть люди, приятные на вид, на вкус и запах тоже ничего, а вот как подышишь возле них, так ты сразу без сил и настроения! Чаще всего это не специально, просто тип личности такой, он неосознанно "сосёт" энергию! Как их вычислять? 👉Вечное нытьё — любимое хобби, ему посвящается вся жизнь 👉Королева Драмы! Создаст её из пустоты, также как Бог создал землю 👉"Как ваши дела? меня не волнует! У меня вот что произошло!" С…
👍3❤2
Тебе попадались энергетические вампиры? ☺Психология личности😭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
☺Психология личности😭
❤3👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psyhopipl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы считаете, если партнеры отдалились друг от друга, это приговор отношениям или этап который нужно пережить? Завтра я поделюсь своим личным мнением! ☺Психология личности😭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Тебе попадались энергетические вампиры? ☺Психология личности😭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ты борешься с судьбой или плывешь по течению? ☺Психология личности😭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 15 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология личности” (@psyhopipl), 703 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyhopipl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.