3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,148–31,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 16:16
31,180
-168
4 Sept 2026, 18:40
31,348
-47
3 Sept 2026, 22:18
31,395
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.2%
avg views ÷ 31,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
8 (13 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
110,800
Reactions total
1,719
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,211 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
333
15.1%
❤
261
11.8%
🔥
248
11.2%
👍
244
11.0%
👌
237
10.7%
🎉
234
10.6%
👏
223
10.1%
💯
170
7.69%
⚡
133
6.02%
🐳
115
5.20%
💩
11
0.498%
🥰
2
0.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 8 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psylika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❄️✨ Сегодня хочется поговорить о сказках и о том, почему они так важны. Они помогают детям в понятной форме проживать сложные вещи, а взрослым дают возможность вернуться к знакомым темам и иногда заметить в них то, что в детстве воспринималось совсем иначе.
🩵 Например, этой осенью выходит новый «Морозко», где знакомую историю сделали легче и теплее. Настя и Марфа здесь больше не соперницы, а подруги: они вместе прох…
Если ваш ребенок переходит в 8–11 класс, хочу сказать вам одну важную вещь: готовиться к экзаменам можно без постоянной тревоги и конфликтов
Я психолог и мама, и я прекрасно понимаю, как легко родителю начать переживать раньше самого ребенка
-А вдруг не сдаст?
-А вдруг поздно начали?
-А вдруг выберет не ту профессию?
-А вдруг не хватит баллов на бюджет?
B какой-то момент вместо поддержки получается бесконечное:
«Т…
«Девочки - это святое», - говорят мамы девочек.«Мальчики и девочки равны», - говорят мамы мальчиков.Так кто же прав?
Проблема начинается тогда, когда правила объясняют только мальчикам. Им говорят: девочек бить нельзя, им нужно уступать, девочек нужно защищать, ты должен быть терпеливее… А девочке при этом иногда забывают сказать, что они тоже должны уважать границы других детей.
И тогда получается перекос.
Девочка…
💜✨ Лунтик — удивительный персонаж: его знают и дети, которые смотрят мультсериал сейчас, и взрослые, которые на нём выросли. При этом во все приключения вплетены очень важные темы: дружба, семья, взросление, принятие тех, кто не похож на тебя.
🌙🥹 В первой части «Лунтик. Возвращение домой» герой воссоединяется с мамой — кажется, на этом моменте плакали вообще все. 27 августа история продолжится в новом анимационном ф…
Каждый год летом я слышу от родителей примерно одно и то же:
«Ну вот, сейчас пусть отдохнёт, а с сентября уже будем серьёзно заниматься…»
И я очень понимаю это желание ❤️
Детям правда нужен отдых. Им нельзя всё лето жить с ощущением, что они кому-то что-то должны.
Но есть и другая крайность: когда после трёх месяцев полного «ничего не делания» ребёнок приходит в сентябре и вдруг понимает, что половина тем забылась…
🚨 «Ваш ребенок пригласил друга… а через час вы мечтаете, чтобы он ушел домой»
Знакомо? 😅
Чужой ребенок открывает шкафы, заходит в спальню без спроса, требует включить другой мультик, просит сладости, которых у вас нет, или берет вещи без разрешения…
И вот вы уже не знаете, что делать.
🤔 Сделать замечание неудобно.🤐 Промолчать тоже не вариант.😬 Вдруг ребенок обидится, а ваш больше не сможет с ним дружить?
На самом …
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @psylika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анжелика Яновская — коуч, бизнесвумен, мама” (@psylika), 31,180 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psylika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
