Channel
@psymarketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,044subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001448287243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psymarketing |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psymarketing |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 1,044 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 1,043 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 1,044 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 1,043 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 1,045 | +4 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 1,041 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 1,043 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 1,040 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 1,040 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 40.5% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 24.1% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 13.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 8.86% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 7.59% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.53% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💚 Онлайн-книжный клуб для психологов: Разбираем «Терапию, сфокусированную на сострадании» Пола Гилберта! Коллеги, знакома ли вам ситуация на сессиях, когда клиент продолжает жестоко грызть себя и утопать в чувстве вины? В таких случаях мы упираемся в глухую стену токсичного стыда и гиперактивного внутреннего Критика. И здесь нам на помощь приходит CFT (Compassion-Focused Therapy). 📖 КНИГА МЕСЯЦА: Пол Гилберт — «Те…
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6
🧠 «Тело помнит всё»: Итоги нашего глубокого и невероятно теплого книжного клуба! Коллеги, огромная благодарность каждому из вас за такую активность, включенность и откровенность! Встреча по фундаментальной книге Бессела ван дер Колка «Тело помнит всё» получилась не просто профессиональной, а по-настоящему поддерживающей. Обсуждая этот объёмный труд, мы затронули ключевые аспекты работы с травмой. Собрала для вас ос…
❤5🔥4
Коллеги! Важная информация! Кажется, сегодня последний день этой стоимости на конференцию от ассоциации контекстуально-поведенческой науки в Красноярске! Каждый год мы встречаемся в разных городах и уже были в Новосибирске, в Екатеринбурге, в Сочи и в Тюмени 🚀 В этом году едем изучать Красноярск 🔥 Подробности в посте выше ⬆️
❤3😍3🙏1
Всем большой Сибирский привет! Это официальный канал V Съезда Ассоциации специалистов в сфере контекстуально-поведенческой науки «АСТябрь в Красноярске»! 🎉 Здесь мы будем делиться всем, что поможет вам подготовиться к Съезду, спланировать свои дни и почувствовать атмосферу нашего мероприятия задолго до его начала 😉 Если вы пока думаете, ехать или нет — надеемся, этот канал поможет принять решение. (Спойлер: конечн…
❤3😍1🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥7
Коллеги, завтра в 10.00 мск у нас онлайн книжный клуб для психологов📚 Обсуждаем книгу «Тело помнит все». Стоимость участия - 1000 руб. Всем, кто мне писал, отправила ссылку на вход, проверяйте! Если нет, напишите мне @chernikova_psy Есть еще 3 местечка, кто с нами?👇
❤6
Коллеги, я же тут с недавних пор рилсы делаю) Пока ничего сказать не могу, тестирую разные форматы. Вроде бы, неплохо, люди подписываются. Сегодня вот такой. Поставила себе некоторые цели до нового года, посмотрим, что выйдет 💪 А что вы делаете, когда клиент внезапно отменяет сессию? Работаете или отдыхаете? 💃
🔥8😁5👍2❤1
📘 Практики, которые реально работают: На последней интервизии мы не искали «идеальные ответы» — мы вытаскивали простые, но структурные техники, которые возвращают клиенту опору, а терапевту — рамку. ✅Сохраняйте, чтобы не потерять. Практика 1. Дневник: «Ситуация → Мысли → Эмоции и тело → Поведение → Выгода → Издержки» Зачем: чтобы вытащить человека из «всё плохо» в понятную структуру, показать, как автоматические…
🔥5❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣8👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9😁2
Доброе утро, коллеги 😁
🤣14❤2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psymarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Этичный психолог” (@psymarketing), 1,044 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psymarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.