Channel
@psyofsexx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
506subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001143425237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyofsexx |
| Created | Between 1 July 2016 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyofsexx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 506 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 505 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 505 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
98 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 38.8% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 19.4% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 7.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итальянский секс без оргазма Говорят, у итальянцев есть слово carezza означающее «ласкать», и одноименный метод, включающий в себя концентрацию на массаже, поглаживаниях и ласках эрогенных зон. Привычные сексуальные сценарии, становясь рутинными, и превращаясь в добычу оргазма, где мы выполняем пятилетку за три года, а не доставляем друг другу удовольствие, снижают со временем либидо в паре и делают секс более редк…
❤9🍓3🔥3👍1
Мужской и женский оргазм: 7 отличий, о которых мало кто знает Когда-то исследователи Уильям Мастерс и Вирджиния Джонсон буквально перевернули представления о сексуальности, показав, что женская сексуальная система устроена вовсе не как «упрощенная версия мужской». Наоборот — по ряду параметров она значительно более вариативна. Важно понимать: мужской и женский оргазм — не противоположности. На уровне работы нервно…
🔥8❤4
Воскресенье - прекрасный повод поорать над рубрикой #всратыемемы
👍9👏2😈2❤1🔥1
«Вступая в отношения, мы оказываемся на территории своего внутреннего хоррора, и иметь карту этой территории - роскошь, доступная не всем» Позаимствовала цитату у коллеги, Наталии Попеко. Эту метафору поймут, пожалуй, только люди, потратившие как минимум пару лет в непрерывной терапии на изучение того, почему они чувствуют себя в отношениях так, как чувствуют, и того, зачем они снова и снова делают в отношениях то,…
❤10
Шок новость! Научный мир снизошел до того, чтобы, наконец, начать изучать сложнейший (по сравнению с мужским) женский организм! 18+ 💥Исследование стало символом того, насколько долго женская анатомия оставалась недостаточно изученной по сравнению с мужской. Ученые впервые построили полную карту нервной системы клитора. 😑Несмотря на то, что клитор является главным органом женской сексуальной чувствительности, его …
🔥8❤3🎉1
В Лондоне легализовали секс на рабочем месте Если вы мечтали о служебном романе со страстным сексом на столе, пока коллеги ушли на обед, возможно, эта новость вам будет по нраву)) Секс-коворкинг открылся в Лондоне — там можно поработать за столом, а потом переместиться на кровати — чтобы, так скажем, размяться и обдумать задачку в более удобной позе. Сначала создатели пространства Stuck занимались организацией кин…
❤🔥3
У вас когда-нибудь был секс на рабочем месте?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ну вы поняли 😁
🤣7❤2
Почему мы режем «каре»после расставания? Рубрика «Подслушано». Сегодня случайно подслушала разговор четырёх девчонок лет 12–15. Мы вместе заходили во двор, потом в подъезд, а затем ещё и ждали один лифт. Всё это время они обсуждали свою знакомую. — Представляете, она после расставания с парнем обрезала каре! — Подождите… у неё вообще был парень? — Ну не дура ли? Зачем вообще девушки так делают? Оказалось, их знакома…
👍4❤2
Она уходит не после стрижки, а тогда, когда её проживают. А волосы… Волосы, к счастью, почти всегда отрастают.
👍5
Почему успешные, красивые, умные женщины часто убиваются по откровенно менее состоявшимся мужчинам? Такое случается, когда бессознательные механизмы берут верх над рациональным выбором. Причиной может быть, на самом деле, что угодно: - синдром спасателя - неустойчивая самооценка - привычка все контролировать - страх одиночества - скука ити страх перед «хорошими парнями» Если узнаете в этом близкую подругу, или даж…
❤7🔥3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @psyofsexx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вас когда-нибудь был секс на рабочем месте?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔞 Про ЭТО САМОЕ | Сексолог Инна Гусева” (@psyofsexx), 506 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyofsexx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.