осуждаю даже писать ничего не буду
😁49🥰4🤡3💯2🤣1

Channel
@ptsd_again
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
20,548subscribers
+880 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002573562642 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ptsd_again |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ptsd_again |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 20,548 | +54 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 20,494 | +36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 20,458 | +60 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:03 | 20,398 | +44 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 20,354 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 20,343 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 20,348 | +20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 20,328 | +19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 20,309 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 20,310 | +17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 20,293 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 20,308 | +17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 20,291 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 20,296 | +12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 20,284 | +34 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 20,250 | +17 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 20,233 | +29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 20,204 | +50 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 20,154 | +46 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 20,108 | first reading |
95 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (21 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 816,050 |
| Reactions total | 22,196 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30,582 reactions across 95 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 7,263 | 23.7% | |
| 🤣 | 7,094 | 23.2% | |
| ❤ | 2,863 | 9.36% | |
| custom 5388849832263719309 | 2,333 | 7.63% | |
| custom 5332286873911985142 | 1,810 | 5.92% | |
| 🫡 | 1,277 | 4.18% | |
| custom 5442861176314692878 | 1,070 | 3.50% | |
| 💯 | 682 | 2.23% | |
| custom 5343990638318754389 | 625 | 2.04% | |
| custom 5278233202958309974 | 597 | 1.95% | |
| custom 5354913925563452572 | 545 | 1.78% | |
| 🔥 | 539 | 1.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 515 | 1.68% | |
| 👍 | 477 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5231319356788475550 | 455 | 1.49% | |
| 😭 | 359 | 1.17% | |
| custom 5260386784914748998 | 243 | 0.795% | |
| 😨 | 240 | 0.785% | |
| 🥰 | 164 | 0.536% | |
| 👎 | 141 | 0.461% | |
| 45 further kinds | 1,290 | 4.22% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
осуждаю даже писать ничего не буду
😁49🥰4🤡3💯2🤣1
3-4 дей и шыврики будут готовы кст, будет масштабный дроп и перерыв до зимы ❄️ 150 шт. - птср 150 шт. - ебалвоевал 150 шт. - 22г. 150 шт. - монеток (идут подарком к заказу)
👍43🔥9❤🔥2
ох, а я еще ебало технаря представил 🥰
🤣85❤11🔥7custom 53322868739119851423
бэпэлы, ну шо тут скажешь 💅
🤣137custom 523131935678847555034❤12💅5custom 53322868739119851424custom 53888498322637193092🥰1custom 53439906383187543891
Video, posted without a caption
😁86custom 534399063831875438916custom 538884983226371930912🔥3🖕2❤1
перед тем как осуждать бэпэла, пройдите километр в его берцах:
🤣208custom 533228687391198514239❤20💅7🤡6🐳3custom 53439906383187543892❤🔥1
сладкая булочка однако, но эвакуировать я его не буду даже за литр клитр энэрджи
😁93🤣59💯23❤2
- с новеньким затягиваешься, работать будете вместе - че за новенький?! новенький:
😁126custom 533228687391198514234custom 523131935678847555012❤11custom 53439906383187543895🔥4
один год я не пью энэргосы благодаря донатам, я взяли кв в ипотеку для дочери (первоначалка) сделал для неё снова новый вклад, только уже в драг. металлах (просто снова коплю) в целом от отказа этого пойла, каких-то изменений я не почувствовал кардинальных (наладился сон) и всё ну и миллион подъебов вердикт? пейте в меру и все будет збс а я продолжаю крепиться въебу розовый рэдбулл тогда, когда закончится СВОу …
❤235🫡108custom 538884983226371930989custom 527823320295830997430❤🔥28👍4🤡1🥰1
мобки не будет, выдыхайте очкошки - верховный ❤️
❤104custom 538884983226371930980custom 533228687391198514234😁31😭15💩3custom 52313193567884755503🤩2
Война — дело жестокое и трудно прогнозируемое. Зеленского придеться задвухсотить — Путин ❤️
custom 5388849832263719309197custom 534399063831875438971🔥38custom 533228687391198514222🤡6🥰6💯5❤3
вам чо, встречались орные позывные не соответствующие типу? что я слышал и видел, это чел ТВАРЬ (бля, рост метр шестнадцать, горбыль лютый, и одна нога короче другой) и второй - АРМАГЕДДОН (вес тридцать три кг. в долг, боком я его не видел, и шорты криво обрезаные из штанов вкпо 3.0)
🤣208👍25❤15🥰6😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @ptsd_again. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ptsd_again edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“птср” (@ptsd_again), 20,548 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptsd_again.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.