Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for куняшагеддон

Channel

куняшагеддон

@puppych1ll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004326548398
TypeChannel
Username@puppych1ll
Created28 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/puppych1ll

Growth

131413.58 August 2026 — 14 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14 subscribers8 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:1414+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:2713-1
12 Aug 2026, 00:3214no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:3114first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5438380924129535811714.3%
🌭612.2%
custom 5278240238114731644510.2%
😡510.2%
custom 542037583281419859648.16%
🍌48.16%
💯48.16%
custom 604630515943945475236.12%
🎃36.12%
custom 532361881815983523224.08%
custom 539348772692850149924.08%
👀24.08%
custom 532551235757148902512.04%
custom 537092753503291204112.04%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC23 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

это очень страшная фотка чувак

🌭6💯4🍌3🎃2👀2

6 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC25 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

а все нету больше реакций класнических

😡5

5 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC27 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

зашла поиграть в булли не поняла почему в меню никто не пздит про зумеров

custom 54383809241295358115custom 52782402381147316443

30 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC41 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

магма с барбарис чан🌟🌟

custom 54203758328141985963🍌1🎃1custom 53236188181598352321custom 53934877269285014991custom 54383809241295358111custom 60463051594394547521

28 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC42 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🐶!!! MEET THE ARTIST йо че как, вообщем 🚬 на данный момент состою ы фандомах стардью валли, View Askewniverse, постала??, муми троллей, металапокалипсиса, хоумстака, девил срет в мае и дельтаруна(андертейла) 🤔ссылки ! 🥹тикток 📞📞 бубст 🥹 чат 🌟🌟 лс канала 😰DNI: если ты поддерживаешь скулшутинг/маньяков, гомофобы, шутишь неуместные тупые шутки и не хочешь быть серьезным, ну и ВСЕ чуваки…

custom 52782402381147316442custom 60463051594394547522custom 53236188181598352321custom 53255123575714890251custom 53709275350329120411custom 53934877269285014991custom 54203758328141985961custom 54383809241295358111

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @puppych1ll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“куняшагеддон” (@puppych1ll), 14 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puppych1ll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.