хотела просто с пропорциями потренироваться ну а с кого рисовать когда зеркало рядом
custom 52174769692512449161

Channel
@pupunya8888
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002921720650 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pupunya8888 |
| Description | Художник(?) рисую чёт чекайте инфопост, всё там |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pupunya8888 |
@pupunya8888 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 30 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
80 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5217476969251244916 | 39 | 48.8% | |
| custom 5312079035604441181 | 18 | 22.5% | |
| custom 5460786767785398171 | 15 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5217812938773009177 | 5 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5217930569337305783 | 3 | 3.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
хотела просто с пропорциями потренироваться ну а с кого рисовать когда зеркало рядом
custom 52174769692512449161
себя наскетчила, хз закончу ли
custom 53120790356044411814custom 54607867677853981713custom 52179305693373057832custom 52174769692512449161
засчетчила перса тт художницы случайно
custom 52174769692512449164custom 53120790356044411814custom 54607867677853981714
завозной ваще для себя в прикол ивент, щас пробно месяц а там посмотрим мб продумаем получше и помосштабнее, мб чисто локалка пока не надоест это число
custom 52174769692512449162
МЫ УЖЕ НАБИРАЕМ БАЛЛЫ И НАЧИНАЕМ БЕЗ ВАС ПУПКИ
custom 52174769692512449162
РЕБЯТА ВСЕ БЫСТРО НА ИВЕНТ 67 https://t.me/+8H1PB8RXLvNlZDYy https://t.me/+8H1PB8RXLvNlZDYy https://t.me/+8H1PB8RXLvNlZDYy
custom 52174769692512449162custom 54607867677853981712custom 53120790356044411811
был коллаб с https://t.me/pupunya8888 мой скетч - её рендер и наоборот на этой пикче ее скетч и мой рендер рендерить я особо не умею, поэтому пришлось применить свои фотошоперские навыки
custom 52174769692512449164
жиза было бы славно
custom 52174769692512449163
оплатите мне психолога кто-нибудь, пожалуйста хахах
custom 52174769692512449163custom 53120790356044411812custom 54607867677853981711
тоже своего рода творчество. моя маленькая гордость 🙂
custom 53120790356044411813custom 52174769692512449161
кто не понял 40к апнула крутая типо
custom 52174769692512449162custom 52179305693373057831
💃💃💃
custom 52174769692512449165custom 52178129387730091773custom 54607867677853981713custom 53120790356044411811
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pupunya8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pupunya | пупуня” (@pupunya8888), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pupunya8888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.