⚡️ Nova Poshta đã chính thức vào thị trường Canada, cho phép gửi bưu kiện tối đa 30 kg giữa Canada và Ukraine. Thời gian giao từ 5 ngày (nếu Putin không phá), có thể gửi qua chuyển phát nhanh hoặc hơn 1.100 điểm UPS Store. Giá gửi từ Canada về Ukraine từ 37 CAD (~1.200 UAH) cho kiện dưới 1 kg. @puzlevn

Channel
Cừu Vàng Lông Đỏ
@puzlevn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,875subscribers
-354 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001653001706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @puzlevn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/puzlevn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 22,875 | -52 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 22,927 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 22,938 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 22,944 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 22,959 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 22,973 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 22,972 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 22,980 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 22,987 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 22,998 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 23,005 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 23,030 | -21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 23,051 | -21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 23,072 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 23,083 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 23,090 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 23,103 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 23,119 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 23,127 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 23,142 | first reading |
Engagement
727 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.97%
- avg views ÷ 22,875 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 450
- 581 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.31%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 581
- of 727 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 505 of 581 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 727 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 261,275 |
| Reactions total | 5,642 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4h 29m
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 307 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,218 reactions across 624 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 2,170 | 30.1% | |
| 🤡 | 1,173 | 16.3% | |
| ❤ | 1,013 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 858 | 11.9% | |
| 💩 | 540 | 7.48% | |
| 🤣 | 529 | 7.33% | |
| 🤬 | 319 | 4.42% | |
| 🔥 | 195 | 2.70% | |
| 😱 | 75 | 1.04% | |
| 😢 | 73 | 1.01% | |
| 🥴 | 72 | 0.998% | |
| 🌚 | 50 | 0.693% | |
| 🗿 | 48 | 0.665% | |
| 🙏 | 34 | 0.471% | |
| 🤔 | 24 | 0.333% | |
| 🖕 | 22 | 0.305% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 0.166% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.083% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 0.069% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 629 of the 727 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 727 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 727 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @puzlevn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 727 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🇨🇳 The War Zone: Công ty vận tải biển nhà nước Trung Quốc COSCO có thể đã sử dụng một số tàu thương mại để bí mật thu thập tình báo tín hiệu (SIGINT) ngoài khơi Bắc Mỹ, châu Âu và châu Á trong nhiều thập kỷ. Theo các nguồn tin từ chính quyền Mỹ, một số tàu được trang bị thiết bị chuyên dụng để thu tín hiệu liên lạc của tàu chiến và máy bay, theo dõi tần số, radar và hệ thống liên lạc quân sự. Đại sứ quán Trung Quốc b…
🇺🇸 Mỹ triển khai hệ thống Tomahawk và NSM tại Na Uy Hình ảnh cho thấy lực lượng Hải quân Mỹ đưa bệ phóng container Tomahawk lên máy bay vận tải C-17A để chuyển tới Trondheim (Na Uy) trong khuôn khổ Atlantic City 2026. Ngoài ra, Mỹ cũng triển khai các bệ phóng NSM/NMESIS trên đảo chiến lược Jan Mayen, Na Uy. NSM có tầm đánh khoảng 250 km, được thiết kế để tấn công tàu mặt nước và mục tiêu ven bờ. Atlantic City 26 là s…
Càng bị Nga tấn công nhiều, chúng tôi càng cười nhiều hơn. - Thầy tiên tri Gordon #bod
🤡6
Hải quân Ukraine đã tấn công tàu hậu cần của Nga mang tên NEFRIT tại cảng Sochi. NEFRIT là một phần của cơ sở hạ tầng hàng hải và năng lượng của Nga, đóng vai trò cung cấp dịch vụ cho các hoạt động dầu khí, bảo trì các công trình trên biển, vận chuyển hàng hóa và nhân viên, đồng thời thực hiện các công việc kỹ thuật dưới nước. #bod
🌝🌝 Trang Exilona từng hả hê thiêu đốt các kho hàng của doanh nghiệp Nga như WB, Ozon,Lenta cho biết Trong tuần qua, Nga được cho là đã tập kích hơn 15 trung tâm phân phối, kho hàng và cơ sở logistics lớn tại Kyiv và tỉnh Kyiv, gây thiệt hại nghiêm trọng và khiến nhiều người thiệt mạng. Trong khi đó, tác giả cho rằng phương Tây phản ứng rất hạn chế, còn tình hình tại Kherson và Donetsk ngày càng trở nên khốc liệt. …
😁5
Do tình trạng các kho hàng siêu thị ở Ukraine bị Gerran thiếu đốt ,một số trường học đã cắt giảm phần ăn trưa của học sinh thành khẩu phần chay thanh đạm #bod
😁2
Các hệ thống phòng không tầm ngắn Rapid Ranger của Anh, trang bị tên lửa LMM Martlet, đang được sử dụng bởi Sư đoàn quân đội số 3 của Lực lượng Vũ trang Ukraine. Hệ thống này được chế tạo dựa trên khung gầm của xe địa hình URO VAMTAC của Tây Ban Nha. Lần đầu tiên thông tin về việc chuyển giao hệ thống này cho Ukraine được công bố vào tháng 3 năm nay. #bod
Một chiếc USV tham gia tấn công vào cảng Sochi bị bắn cháy #DucHao
Ở khu định cư Sviatohirsk này có một cái tu viện Chính thống giáo rất nổi tiếng, và cũng rất lộng lẫy. Hi vọng tu viện này không bị bom đạn hoặc chí ít cũng ít bị tàn phá https://maps.app.goo.gl/MqYLmy7ioptqDjXc9 #DucHao
❤2
BQP Nga hôm qua ra thông báo quân Z chiếm được khu định cư Sviatohirsk. Tuy nhiên theo như map của Rybar cũng như các map khác thì quân Z vừa bị Ukraina đẩy ra xa khỏi khu định cư này. Hiện admin chưa thấy có thông tin hình ảnh gì củng cố cho tuyên bố này nên cũng chả dám khẳng định tuyên bố của BQP Nga có đúng không vì tụi Z báo cáo láo nhiều lần rồi nên không dám tin🥹, nên cứ cho Rybar và các map khác tạm thời uy t…
🤔5
‼️🇷🇺🇮🇷 Trump đang nghĩ đến việc đổi tên eo biển Hormuz thành “Eo biển Trump” “Giờ đây khi nó đã nằm dưới sự kiểm soát của Mỹ, chẳng phải chúng ta nên đổi tên eo biển Hormuz thành EO BIỂN TRUMP sao??? Giống như chính nước Mỹ, nơi này sẽ trở nên ‘nóng’ hơn bao giờ hết!” @puzlevn
😁21
Showing the 12 most recent of 727 posts we hold for @puzlevn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@caphebanthesu · 9,06010 postsKhỉ Đít Đỏ
@putieu · 1,9615 postsGóc Nhìn Chính Trị | Kênh Tin Tức Chính Trị Quốc Tế | Political News.
@gocnhinchinhtri · 27,1631 postĐại diện Cục Tình báo Phụ Ukraina tại Việt Nam
@gurvnn · 721 postDonbass and Russia - Vladimir Putin
@Putin1_news · 2,6611 postTân Hoa Xã
@xinhuavn · 261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@sbuvn · 59316 postsВоенная хроника
@Warhronika · 306,1486 postsYonHap VN
@yonhapvn · 136 postsĐại diện Cục Tình báo Phụ Ukraina tại Việt Nam
@gurvnn · 722 postsМинобороны России
@mod_russia · 650,0742 postsОфіцер
@officer_33 · 184,0852 postsРыбарь
@rybar · 1,548,1542 postsВоин DV
@voin_dv · 146,7642 postsДенацификация UA
@denazi_UA · 63,7001 postОсведомитель
@infomil_live · 94,5791 postMilitary Journal ✙
@MiliTJournal · 11,2701 postMosaad Vina
@mossadvn · 251 postKhỉ Đít Đỏ
@putieu · 1,9611 postГоворять Снайпер ꑭ
@stanislav_osman · 290,4691 postВойна с фейками
@warfakes · 380,4751 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tinnongchiensu · 34,640
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
@quantin · 82,621
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@Waroftho · 46,139
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@gimbaled · 45,217
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cừu Vàng Lông Đỏ” (@puzlevn), 22,875 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puzlevn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.