Channel
@pwsmetod
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
400subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002227332533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pwsmetod |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 5 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pwsmetod |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 400 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 399 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 398 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 396 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 396 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 99 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 36.4% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.17% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.543% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠База PWS Интеграторов Мы выпустили новый поток PWS Интеграторов 4.0 Вы сможете пройти PWS-проработку у наших интеграторов и проработать свой запрос, который давно внутри. Они проведут для вас 3 бесплатные сессии. Правило: одна бесплатная проработка в одни руки 🫶 Выбирайте своего интегратора сердцем и идите в свою лучшую жизнь✨ 📌Анастасия Сударикова — @sty_grews PWS-интегратор, специалист по Матрице души 📌Род…
❤3🔥2👍1🙏1
Posted without readable text
🔥6❤3👍2👏2
Секрет из книги древней магии 1600 г. СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕОУРОК 🔵Как управлять пространством через стихии 🔵С чего на самом деле нужно начинать работу с собой или с клиентами, чтобы действовать точно в цель? 🔵Как работать с сущностями и привязками? И почему после чисток сначала наступает облегчение, а потом часто становится хуже? 🔵Почему маги не могут наслать воздействие на политических лидеров? 🔵Почему практики не работают…
Мы стартовали! 🚀 Сегодня мы официально начали обучение на Курсе «PWS Интегратор» МЕТОД PWS Phenomenon of White Sphere* — Феномен белой сферы *зарегистрированный товарный знак — практическая психология для помогающих практиков — метод работы с травмой Девчонки начали смотреть уроки и уже пишут свои первые отзывы 🫶 А я вспоминаю себя, когда первый раз проходила этот курс в свое время 🌀👁️ он тоже оставил неизгладимо…
🔥14❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
Открываем раннее бронирование курса PWS Интегратор. МЕТОД PWS Phenomenon of White Sphere* — Феномен белой сферы *зарегистрированный товарный знак Вы все спрашивали: когда когда следующий поток? 🫶 Старт обучения 3 ноября. Идем обучаться самому эффективному методу работы с травмой: ➡️работать можно в классическом психологическом подходе. Если вы психолог и хотите усилить практику или не знаете, как работать с клие…
🔥12❤8
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
Отзыв о курсе PWS Интегратор ⤵️
🔠🔠🔠База PWS Интеграторов, готовых провести безоплатные сессии Вы сможете пройти PWS-проработку у наших интеграторов и проработать свой запрос, который давно вас мучает. Они проведут для вас 3 бесплатные сессии. Правило: одна бесплатная проработка в одни руки 🫶 Выбирайте своего интегратора сердцем и идите в свою лучшую жизнь✨ 📌 @oksanavict Оксана Шульга PWS-интегратор. Консультант по Матрице души, коуч по стандарт…
❤7
Девочки, доброе утро всем ☀️ Хочу поделиться своими эмоциями! Вчера проводила консультацию девушке, которая не много потерялась в своих чувствах и эмоциях, и сильно зависит от мнения окружающих. Так вот, консультацию я проводила исходя из знаний, которые получила на этом обучении и вы не представляете как я довольна тем, как и что я говорила. Я сама от себя а шоке, настолько все глубоко и понятно. И главное, что мой …
🔥9❤2👍2
Помните в одном из эфиров я говорила, что обучение PWS помогает справиться со страхом консультирования? 🪬 — через уверенные знания и понимание причин и следствия — через проработку своих блоков Так вот… Второй поток PWS Интегратор - прошло полторы недели обучения и девочки в чате делятся 🫶⤵️
❤4
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pwsmetod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интегратор. Предобучение” (@pwsmetod), 400 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwsmetod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.