Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پیک نت - Pyknet

Channel

پیک نت - Pyknet

@pyknet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,493subscribers

-158 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005268075
TypeChannel
Username@pyknet
Created9 January 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pyknet

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,49317,65317,5735 August 2026 — 17,651 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,651 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,653 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,652 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,643 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,638 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,635 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,632 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,629 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,623 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,610 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,607 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,606 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,602 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,601 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,592 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,596 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,587 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,586 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,580 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,581 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,574 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,567 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,565 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,556 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,551 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,546 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,543 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,533 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,526 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,519 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,498 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,493 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,469–17,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:4117,493-5
15 Sept 2026, 23:3717,498-21
14 Sept 2026, 03:2017,519-7
12 Sept 2026, 08:4017,526-7
10 Sept 2026, 05:3617,533-10
6 Sept 2026, 20:4217,543-3
4 Sept 2026, 05:4117,546-5
2 Sept 2026, 19:4317,551-5
1 Sept 2026, 21:2317,556-9
31 Aug 2026, 21:2517,565-2
30 Aug 2026, 18:0717,567-7
29 Aug 2026, 18:1317,574-7
28 Aug 2026, 20:2417,581+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:0317,580-6
26 Aug 2026, 19:0517,586-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:3317,587-9
24 Aug 2026, 14:1317,596+4
23 Aug 2026, 00:5817,592-9
21 Aug 2026, 16:1717,601-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:0317,602first reading

Engagement

158 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 17,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
58
of 158 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held158 (4 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total143,770
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 18s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC≈2,890 viewsread 3 September 2026

عنوان اول پیک نت 11 شهریور اعلام استقبال ایران از پیوستن به پیمان "نظامی مکه" از جمله دستآوردهای اجلاس شانگهای در "قرقیزستان"، علاوه بر دیدارهائی که پزشکیان با رهبران چین، روسیه، آذربایجان و چند کشور دیگر داشت، نظری است که وی با صراحت درباره پیمان "مکه" مطرح کرد. نظری که بی شک پیش از عزیمت به قرقیزستان، در تهران در عالی ترین سطوح درباره آن تصمیم گرفته شده بود. بویژه که زمزمه های جدی بر سر پیوستن ایران به این پیمان

1 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 3 September 2026

ایران، آن ایران سال 43 در جنگ دوم جهانی نیست! ریا نووستی- پتر آکوپوف آمریکایی‌ها نمی‌ توانند اصطلاحی را برای “پیروزی خود بر ایران” تصور کنند. در رقابت با ترامپ، وزیر خزانه‌ داری او، بسنت، حتی پا را فراتر گذاشت و تحریم‌های اعلام شده توسط واشنگتن علیه شرکای تجاری ایران را با پیاده شدن متفقین در نرماندی در روز D - افتتاح جبهه دوم علیه هیتلر در اروپا توسط ایالات متحده و بریتانیای کبیر در ژوئیه ۱۹۴۴ - مقایسه کرد. جبهه او

1 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,650 viewsread 3 September 2026

SCO یک اتحاد نظامی نیست، اما میتواند و باید به اتحادیه ای از کشورها تبدیل شود که به دنبال محافظت از حاکمیت خود و امنیت کل منطقه هستند. در این زمینه، بیشکک-۲۶، حتی اگر به تهران-۴۳ تبدیل نشود، جهت حرکت مشترک بین قدرتهای آسیایی و روسیه را نشان خواهد داد. حمایت آنها از ایران نه تنها برای جمهوری اسلامی، بلکه برای آینده تمام اوراسیا و کل جهان از اهمیت فوقالعادهای برخوردار است. https://ria.ru/20260830/akopov-2114018435.htm

1 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 3 September 2026

جنگ اقتصادی امریکا نیز مانند جنگ نظامی شکست میخورد ترجمه از سایت استالیستیه در حالی که دونالد ترامپ پیش از این روی تشدید تنش نظامی حساب باز کرده و قول داده بود که "کشور را تا جهنم بمباران کند"، اکنون با درک اینکه مردم ایران را نمی‌توان مرعوب کرد، تصمیم گرفته است که ایران سرکش را از نظر اقتصادی در هم بشکند. عملیات “دولت یاغی اقتصادی” که به دستور رئیس جمهور ترامپ روز دوشنبه آغاز شد. اسکات بسنت، وزیر خزانه‌داری ایالات

1 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 3 September 2026

البته روابط با چین، روسیه و سایر نهادهای غیرغربی می‌تواند بخشی از ظرفیت لازم برای کاهش آسیب‌ پذیری ایران را فراهم کند، اما جایگزین سازماندهی داخلی اقتصاد نیست. چین سال‌ها بزرگ‌ ترین خریدار نفت ایران است. تجارت منطقه‌ای، مبادله با ارزهای غیردلاری و مسیرهای زمینی و آسیایی همچنان می‌توانند بخشی از وابستگی به نظام مالی تحت کنترل آمریکا را کاهش دهند. اهمیت شرق در این بحث نه به‌عنوان نجات‌دهنده ایران، بلکه به‌عنوان یکی از

1 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 3 September 2026

سرمقاله راه توده 1012 ج. اسلامی هنوز درک نکرده که شرایط جنگی بر جهان حاکم شده ایران در حال از سرگذراندن بزرگترین بحران اقتصادی پس از انقلاب ۵۷ است. البته بحران اقتصادی ایران با جنگ آغاز نشده است، اما جنگ، تشدید فشار اقتصادی آمریکا و بی عملی عمدی حاکمیت آن را وارد مرحله تازه‌ای کرده‌است. بهای دلار در هفته اخیر مرز ۲۰۰ هزارتومان را پشت سر گذاشت. بهای کالاهای اساسی و غیراساسی در چند ماهه اخیر از ۴ تا ۱۰ برابر افزایش یا

1 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

هدف نیز حفظ سطح مصرف دوران عادی نیست. جنگی که در جهان آغاز شده و کشور ما و تمام منطقه خاورمیانه، آمریکا، اروپا، آمریکای لاتین و تا حدودی آسیا نیز در حال پرداخت هزینه آن هستند واقعیتی است که نمی توان آن را با تخیل پروری و فرمان اداری از میان برد. از نظر تاب آوری ملی مسئله اصلی این است که "چه کسی این هزینه را می‌پردازد". نمی‌توان از جامعه خواست فشار یک منازعه طولانی را تحمل کند، اما اجازه داد هزینه آن عمدتاً به حقوق‌بگ

1 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 3 September 2026

راه توده 1012 هفته نامه راه توده - شماره 1012 (چهارشنبه 11 شهریور 1405)- منتشر شد و مطالب آن علاوه بر سایت این نشریه، روی فیسبوک و کانال تلگرام راه توده نیز قرار گرفت.

Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @pyknet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@pyknet edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IRFILMIRAN
@IR_filMiRaN · 32,227
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پیک نت - Pyknet” (@pyknet), 17,493 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pyknet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.