Channel
@python_war
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001640568339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @python_war |
| Created | 15 January 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/python_war |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
14 posts held, back to 15 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
61 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 44.3% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 37.7% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2022 to 5 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kodning natijasi qanday bo'ladi ??
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Kodning natijasi qanday boladi?👆👆👆
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
Kodning natijasi qanday boladi ?? 👆👆👆
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3👍2🤔2
Photo, posted without a caption
Python kodining natijasi qanday boladi???
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4🤔2
Photo, posted without a caption
Kodning natijasida nima chiqadi ? a = [1, 3, 8, 7] a [1:4:-1]
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3🔥3
Berilgan PYTHON kodning javobi qanday boladi ??? (Tepadagi rasm )
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
print(bool(print(print(5))))
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍6🔥4😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @python_war. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kodning natijasi qanday bo'ladi ??
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kodning natijasi qanday boladi?👆👆👆
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kodning natijasi qanday boladi ?? 👆👆👆
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Python kodining natijasi qanday boladi???
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kodning natijasida nima chiqadi ? a = [1, 3, 8, 7] a [1:4:-1]
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Berilgan PYTHON kodning javobi qanday boladi ??? (Tepadagi rasm )
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2022 to 5 March 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 980,219 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Python QUIZ” (@python_war). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/python_war.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.