Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Python задачки

Channel

Python задачки

@pythonquestions

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,860subscribers

-120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001222541656
TypeChannel
Username@pythonquestions
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pythonquestions

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,86011,98011,9206 August 2026 — 11,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,979 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,977 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,973 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,971 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,972 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,969 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,972 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,967 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,959 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,953 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,952 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,937 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,935 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,934 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,931 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,929 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,924 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,921 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,920 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,918 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,908 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,901 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,902 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,899 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,897 subscribers30 September 2026 — 11,880 subscribers5 October 2026 — 11,860 subscribers6 August 20265 October 2026
28 measurements spanning 61 days, net -120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,842–11,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 22:2011,860-20
30 Sept 2026, 12:5911,880-17
18 Sept 2026, 05:1911,897-2
16 Sept 2026, 01:3911,899-3
14 Sept 2026, 07:2111,902+1
12 Sept 2026, 15:1511,901-7
10 Sept 2026, 15:4011,908-10
7 Sept 2026, 09:1911,918-2
2 Sept 2026, 00:0511,920-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:5711,921-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:4611,924-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:4811,929-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:4811,931-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:2411,934-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:0511,935-2
26 Aug 2026, 00:3411,937-15
25 Aug 2026, 03:5611,952-1
24 Aug 2026, 00:1311,953-6
18 Aug 2026, 22:5911,959-8
16 Aug 2026, 20:5611,967first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1840.9%
❤1022.7%
🔥511.4%
🤔49.09%
🎉24.55%
🙏24.55%
👎12.27%
👏12.27%
🤨12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
8.00%
2 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
637
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,310
over 23 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvmZB3h125 August 202625 August 2026
2W5zFJZsYhf115 July 202615 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC567 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Каким будет вывод этого кода в консоли?

  1. True64%
  2. False9%
  3. Ошибка8%
  4. Никакого вывода не будет13%
  5. Посмотреть ответ5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC637 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvmZB3hPhoto

🔍Тестовое собеседование на Middle Python с разработчиком из Яндекса завтра вечером Уже завтра вечером в 19:00 по мск приходи онлайн на открытое собеседование, чтобы посмотреть на настоящее интервью на Middle Python-разработчика. Как это будет: 📂 Хачатур, старший разработчик в Яндексе, будет задавать реальные вопросы и задачи разработчику-добровольцу 📂 Хачатур будет комментировать каждый ответ респондента, чтобы дат…

👍2❤1👏1

25 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC635 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Каким будет вывод этого кода?

  1. [1, 2, 3, 4]14%
  2. [1234]16%
  3. [[1], [2], [3], [4]]47%
  4. Ошибка19%
  5. Посмотреть ответ5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

One Day Offer для Python-разработчиков!💚 15 августа открываем двери в команду Agent Execution Framework ⚡️ Коллеги создают платформу для GenAI‑агентов в банке — делают так, чтобы ИИ реально работал в серьёзных финпроцессах: с безопасностью, нагрузкой и пользой. Чем предстоит заниматься: ✔️ развивать backend на Python ✔️ подключать LLM, инструменты, базы знаний и RAG ✔️ строить пайплайны оценки качества агентов ✔️…

👍4❤2🙏2👎1

15 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJZsYhf

LLM (большие языковые модели) или агент LLM и ИИ-агент — эти слова часто звучат в одном ряду, будто это одно и то же. На деле — два разных объекта. LLM отвечает на запрос. Все, что за пределами окна диалога, ей не принадлежит. Агент — это модель плюс код вокруг нее: правила проекта, доступ к файлам, автопроверка тестов, взаимная проверка кода моделями. Модель пишет, а обвязка решает, что оставить, что переписать, ч…

3 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Каким будет результат выполнения кода?

  1. [1, 2, 3]16%
  2. 4229%
  3. [42]8%
  4. [1, 42, 3]29%
  5. None2%
  6. Error9%
  7. Посмотреть ответ6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,280 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @pythonquestions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz182 voters

Каким будет вывод этого кода в консоли?

  1. True64%
  2. False9%
  3. Ошибка8%
  4. Никакого вывода не будет13%
  5. Посмотреть ответ5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz200 voters

Каким будет вывод этого кода?

  1. [1, 2, 3, 4]14%
  2. [1234]16%
  3. [[1], [2], [3], [4]]47%
  4. Ошибка19%
  5. Посмотреть ответ5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz255 voters

Каким будет результат выполнения кода?

  1. [1, 2, 3]16%
  2. 4229%
  3. [42]8%
  4. [1, 42, 3]29%
  5. None2%
  6. Error9%
  7. Посмотреть ответ6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jun 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz238 voters

Каким будет результат выполнения кода?

  1. 0 1 2 3 4 PythonQuestions42%
  2. 0 1 2 3 4 5 PythonQuestions8%
  3. 0 1 2 3 444%
  4. 0 1 2 3 4 53%
  5. Посмотреть ответ4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz246 voters

Каким будет результат выполнения кода?

  1. solo5%
  2. pysolo15%
  3. solopy49%
  4. sopy5%
  5. None2%
  6. Error9%
  7. Посмотреть ответ15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz229 voters

Каким будет результат выполнения кода?

  1. ['a', 'b', 'c']20%
  2. ['c', 'b', 'a']30%
  3. ['a', 'b', 'b']16%
  4. ['c', 'a', 'b']18%
  5. None2%
  6. Error7%
  7. Посмотреть ответ7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Python задачки” (@pythonquestions), 11,860 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pythonquestions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.