Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,781–1,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:00
1,890
-4
13 Sept 2026, 17:37
1,894
+6
9 Sept 2026, 15:39
1,888
+5
4 Sept 2026, 13:38
1,883
+3
31 Aug 2026, 21:53
1,880
+10
29 Aug 2026, 02:45
1,870
+24
26 Aug 2026, 05:32
1,846
+10
22 Aug 2026, 22:22
1,836
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:14
1,837
+7
16 Aug 2026, 19:44
1,830
+20
13 Aug 2026, 00:03
1,810
+8
10 Aug 2026, 05:54
1,802
+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,800
+4
6 Aug 2026, 14:31
1,796
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:23
1,796
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
228 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
71
31.1%
🔥
51
22.4%
🤣
41
18.0%
❤
30
13.2%
🤡
15
6.58%
👍
12
5.26%
🤔
4
1.75%
🤬
2
0.877%
custom 5875075357492646667
1
0.439%
👎
1
0.439%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 21 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qcakz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Оказывается, если вы заплатите в Kaspi ❤️ магазине за Express доставку, но вам не доставят товар в срок, то деньги за фактически ненадлежаще оказанную услугу вам не вернут. 😳
Сегодня утром заказал в SuperPrice (он же Sulpak) несколько товаров, специально указал время доставки с 13:00 до 15:00, пока я в офисе. В итоге сейчас время уже 18 часов и я вынужден остаться в офисе. Написал обращение в техподдержку Kaspi, их …
В Казахстан 🇰🇿 завезли из России 🇷🇺и выпустили в дикую природу тигра 🐅.
Это проект по восстановлению популяции туранского тигра, о котором договаривались президенты Токаев 🇰🇿 и Путин 🇷🇺 еще в далёком 2021 году.
Радостно видеть, что этот экологический проект не забросили: https://youtu.be/tS13BxCCzX8
В соцсетях пишут, что у Kasper AI ❤️ срабатывает Political Guardrails на запрос про события на площади Тяньаньмэнь в 1989 году. Якобы это доказывает, что в основе модели Kaspi лежит какая-то китайская разработка (Qwen, Kimi, GLM и т.д.).
Я тоже решил проверить это, сравнив сработку с аналогичным промптом из истории Казахстана. Как видим на скринах, ответы защитных сработок отличаются.
Чуть-чуть дополню оригинальный пост - предлагаемые поправки ограничивают срок деятельности АО "Казахтелеком" и ТОО "Центр развития цифровой экономики" на рынке кибербезопасности (ОКЭД 62092) до 31.12.2029 и до 31.12.2027, соответственно.
Обоснование следующее:
определение срока присутствия АО «Казахтелеком» на рынке - до 31.12.2029 в соответствии с заключениями АЗРК от 31.03.2026 № 01-12/105-ХР на основании постанов…
Как пояснили РБК три источника, знакомые с ситуацией, это связано с отзывом зарубежных SSL-сертификатов. По их словам, банк перешел на сертификат Национального удостоверяющего центра Минцифры, который не поддерживается большинством иностранных браузеров.
https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/03/08/2026/6a70c0239a7947e16e3c1c7d
В шести словах о защите персональных данных в KZ: мужчина зашел в чужой аккаунт eGov.
По его словам, он отсканировал QR, но вместо своего личного кабинета оказался в чужом и получил доступ к данным некого Аскара. В eGov сообщили, что связались с не Аскаром и выясняют, как это произошло.
Cейчас можно получить Gemini Plus бесплатно на 12 месяцев.
Для пользователей из Казахстана VPN не требуется.
Регистрируемся на:
https://internshala.com/
При регистрации требуется указать данные об образовании. Можно использовать следующий шаблон:
Degree: MBA
Course: Master of Business Administration
Specialization: Information Technology Management
College: Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore
Start Yea…
Обновил подборку со списком ОЦИБов, на текущий момент их 46.
Из особенностей:
1. Ранее видел, что "Inova Tech" получила зачем-то два одинаковых приложения на ОЦИБ, сейчас вижу что одно из приложений к деятельности стало недействительным.
2. У ТОО "Nitro Team" отобрали лицензию на ОЦИБ (статус - прекращена, а не "прекращена добровольно"). Скорее всего это из-за того, что не подали соответствующие документы в установл…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @qcakz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
bluescreen.kz @bluescreenkz · 24,045 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
IT Вакансии Казахстан @workitkz · 35,636 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сертификат безопасности” (@qcakz), 1,890 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qcakz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.