Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Q Clarence 🐸

Channel

Q Clarence 🐸

@qclarence

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

352subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001465572021
TypeChannel
Username@qclarence
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qclarence

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3523603568 August 2026 — 360 subscribers8 August 2026 — 360 subscribers15 August 2026 — 358 subscribers22 August 2026 — 357 subscribers8 September 2026 — 354 subscribers17 September 2026 — 352 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 351–361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:01352-2
8 Sept 2026, 20:56354-3
22 Aug 2026, 18:03357-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:55358-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:33360no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:30360first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @officialbadlandsmedia

A federal judge in Washington on Tuesday dismissed all remaining charges against Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and eight co-defendants in the January 6 Capitol case. https://badlandsmedia.tv/judge-drops-remaining-oath-keepers-charges-in-jan-6-case

❤1

6 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

Right. The resistance is because we're uneducated, not that we see through the fraud and corruption and lack of real science. Gotcha. "Focus group results revealed widespread public hesitation and explicit opposition regarding vaccinations delivered in dental practices. Study participants expressed reluctance that varied depending on the specific vaccine offered. Notably, respondents displayed significantly greater …

6 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026

Congress now holding Fauci in contempt just like me. That'll teach him. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/senate-committee-votes-to-hold-anthony-fauci-in-contempt/

6 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

Big story, long forgotten or covered up. https://marsishaunted.substack.com/p/resurrecting-the-battle-of-los-angeles-9af

6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026

"One of many issues." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9yizR2fab8

1 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC61 viewsread 8 August 2026

"This is a surrender. Not the kind that means giving up. The kind that means stepping out of God’s way so He can do what He’s already said He’ll do." https://rethinkbible.substack.com/p/what-be-still-and-know-that-i-am

1 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026

The CDC, which for years lied outright on their website that "vaccines do not cause autism," a claim which has never been scientifically studied, switched to new wording last November, under the direction of RFKJr. "“Vaccines do not cause autism” is not an evidence-based claim. Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism. However, this statement …

30 Jul 2026, 23:58 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Here’s the thing, and it’s the reason why my prediction that Fauci wouldn’t take the Fifth was wrong. I think liberals had expected Fauci to mount a total defense of his time in the hot seat and wipe the floor with Senator Paul. It was billed as a showdown. But at the last second, the good doctor pulled out. I think that Fauci’s visible cowardice hit his progressive fan base hard, even if they’ll never admit it. Be…

❤3

30 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @officialbadlandsmedia

The U.S. will immediately release $600 million in appropriated funds to Gavi after the group agreed to major reforms on vaccine safety, transparency, and operations. President Trump directed Secretaries RFK Jr. and Marco Rubio to secure the changes to strengthen safety standards and align Gavi with Gold Standard Science and taxpayer accountability. https://badlandsmedia.tv/trump-admin-secures-gavi-reforms-releases-6…

30 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC43 viewsread 8 August 2026

"School-based routine or universal mental health screening “often functions as an entry point into a therapeutic culture that pathologizes normal childhood distress, erodes resilience and funnels children toward psychiatric labels, therapy, and medication,” Watson said." https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/schools-pushing-mental-health-screening-research-does-more-harm-than-good/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qclarence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Q Clarence 🐸” (@qclarence), 352 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qclarence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.