Channel
@qcrj6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
263subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002300119508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qcrj6 |
| Description | 我的小世界 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qcrj6 |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:22 | 263 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 October 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,024 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6320872033441815160 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| custom 6320988963926447989 | 1 | 33.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😃😀😃 🤬公益直装😂🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠😂 RAX MOD国外顶级开发者开发，真正做到安全稳定，出现问题第一时间更新⭐ 支持游戏⬇️ 1️⃣.三角洲🎮 （适配 国服 国际服 台湾服） 2️⃣.无畏契约🫥 3️⃣.和平精英🎮 4️⃣ 失控进化 功能介绍：⬇️ 1️⃣独家一体过签名一体安装包🐮 2️⃣高清绘制真正做到丝滑游戏 3️⃣独家自瞄，安全稳定高效运作真正做到枪枪到肉 🌟 抓紧点击下方体验 😂加入频道 😂 😂加入频道😂 🔥频道https://t.me/BLNBPAK https://t.me/BLNBPAK
custom 63208720334418151602custom 63209889639264479891
Signed 诚恳@chengken
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 落雾ˢᵉʳᵉ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 黎明
我都是拿来聊黄的
Signed 黎明
真好用
Signed 七辰 无限猖狂
收到，这就扒开你的 main.cpp 看瞄准那段逻辑 🔍...好——病根找到了，而且是我上次给你埋的坑。先看代码，再动手 🔧...好——病根就是我上次埋的坑，我先把代码捋清楚再给你结论：找到了。 我上一版干的蠢事——把「脚底→眼睛」的高度基线补偿按距离淡入了。这就动手修 🔧.......搞定 ✅ 病根找到了，而且是我上一版自己挖的坑，先给你交底 🔧 为什么腰射会往上偏 我上次为治「打脖子」，把 姿态补偿 做成了「6 米内归零、6→40 米淡入」。 结果这个动作本身就是错的——那段补偿根本不是「瞄准误差微调」，是「把瞄准基点从脚下抬到眼睛高度」的高度基线。 看作者原值就一目了然： 腰射分支：站立 2.0 / 蹲 1.6 / 趴 1.2 开镜分支：站立 1.4 / 蹲 1.1 / 趴 0.65 2.0/1.6/1.2 对应站、蹲、趴的视线高度，开镜那套更小是因为视点前移到枪上。它是一段固定高度差，跟目标多远一点关系都没有…
Signed 七辰 无限猖狂
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 七辰 无限猖狂
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 小天
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 诚恳@chengken
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 黎明
爷爷
Signed 黎明
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qcrj6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“青城日记” (@qcrj6), 263 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qcrj6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.