Channel

富盛集团通用频道

@qfgxpd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,698subscribers

-3,625 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001919826513
Type	Channel
Username	@qfgxpd
Created	Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	11 September 2026
Measurements held	29
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/qfgxpd

Growth

29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -3,625. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,154–13,867 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
11 Sept 2026, 11:39	9,698	-532
8 Sept 2026, 20:57	10,230	-629
5 Sept 2026, 12:59	10,859	-304
3 Sept 2026, 16:00	11,163	-271
2 Sept 2026, 08:44	11,434	-158
1 Sept 2026, 12:03	11,592	-235
31 Aug 2026, 11:55	11,827	-228
30 Aug 2026, 10:45	12,055	-304
29 Aug 2026, 07:53	12,359	-174
28 Aug 2026, 11:04	12,533	-196
27 Aug 2026, 13:05	12,729	-206
26 Aug 2026, 14:12	12,935	-14
25 Aug 2026, 13:03	12,949	-17
24 Aug 2026, 16:24	12,966	-5
23 Aug 2026, 04:07	12,971	-27
21 Aug 2026, 15:47	12,998	-6
20 Aug 2026, 16:12	13,004	-14
19 Aug 2026, 16:33	13,018	-12
18 Aug 2026, 19:02	13,030	-50
17 Aug 2026, 17:06	13,080	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

15 Mar 2026, 05:29 UTC292 viewsread 3 September 2026

双向联系 @kefu27bot

15 Mar 2026, 05:28 UTC282 viewsread 3 September 2026

淘宝京东刷单联系业务员 @kefu27

15 Mar 2026, 05:28 UTC286 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/fstbsxl

15 Mar 2026, 05:25 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «富盛集团通用频道»

15 Mar 2026, 05:25 UTCviews —

Channel photo updated

15 Mar 2026, 05:01 UTC173 viewsread 3 September 2026

🆘此广告为本频道VIP客户，请放心做单！🆘 新项目风口趁现在没有风控做第一波吃肉的人公群10万+做单人员，公群运营长达两年之久，无任何风险 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 群内10万➕做单人数放心做单！！！众信代收集团 5年老品牌值得信赖【纯裸聊直播会员充值料承接16家平台】👍👍👍 收支付宝个人收款码，微信个人收款码，QQ收款码，一二类银行卡，所有进的料子保48小时不风控 ⚠️上押人民币300起步 ————————————————————— 相当于白资换黄资✅ 押300 入码550 利润250 押500 入码880 利润＝380 押1000 入码1950 利润＝950 押2000 入码3900 利润＝1900 押3000 入码5900 利润＝2900 押4000 入码7800 利润=3800 押5000 入码9800 利润=4800 ————————————————————— 支持😀😀👍👍…

15 Mar 2026, 02:03 UTC100 viewsread 3 September 2026

14 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC77 viewsread 3 September 2026

14 Mar 2026, 07:04 UTC73 viewsread 3 September 2026

14 Mar 2026, 05:00 UTC55 viewsread 3 September 2026

14 Mar 2026, 02:00 UTC33 viewsread 3 September 2026

13 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC31 viewsread 3 September 2026

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qfgxpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

清风担保·官方公告📢
@qfdbgg · 4,7271 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

众信集团官方直开小额代收⚡️
@pfnb667 · 21,57215 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 1; vacant every time we have ever looked

@qfgxpd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@kefu27
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“富盛集团通用频道” (@qfgxpd), 9,698 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qfgxpd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.