Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 茜茜の后花园

Channel

茜茜の后花园

@qianqgade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

316subscribers

+49 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004214908843
TypeChannel
Username@qianqgade
Created31 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qianqgade

Growth

267316291.55 September 2026 — 267 subscribers5 September 2026 — 267 subscribers7 September 2026 — 294 subscribers14 September 2026 — 316 subscribers5 September 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 19:41316+22
7 Sept 2026, 21:38294+27
5 Sept 2026, 13:23267no change
5 Sept 2026, 12:47267first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 31 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 316 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.6
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held9 (31 August 20265 September 2026)
Views total424
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC67 viewsread 5 September 2026

世界那么大,我要去看看钱包那么小,谁都走不了。

3 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC64 viewsread 5 September 2026

【验证时间】:9.3 【验证留名】:KO DD 【老师艺名】:茜茜 【联系方式】:@wsqianqbb 【修车水费】:800p 【颜值身材】:身材顶,清纯甜美 【凶器罩杯】:B+ 【优点缺点】:女友感,颜值在线 【服务项目】:课表全做 【出击体验】:在酒店门口见到,第一印象就是茜茜妹妹好有气质哦,有礼貌,交谈也很有亲和力,很自然,落落大方,引领来到房间,一起冲冲冲澡,衣服一脱好美的小白兔胸型,柳叶细腰的,一双大长腿,雪白的皮肤,精致的五官,看着是多么拥有吸引力,犹如一幅画卷映入眼帘,服务很主动,口活很棒,很享受,完了后也是,老师也是主动攻击我,女上入魂进入,水润润的,十分温暖,,抽查中,每股暖流直击灵魂,温柔甜美的呻吟声加上这妩媚得眼神,可谓是十足得视觉听觉体验,最后在喜欢的后入中卸货,解决战斗,拥抱🫂入怀,嗯嗯,老师给的体验太好了,下次必须回食👍

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @qianqgade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“茜茜の后花园” (@qianqgade), 316 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qianqgade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.