Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 纤纤的后花园🌹

Channel

纤纤的后花园🌹

@qianqian008009

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

881subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003947128029
TypeChannel
Username@qianqian008009
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qianqian008009

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

79388183724 August 2026 — 793 subscribers25 August 2026 — 802 subscribers31 August 2026 — 837 subscribers10 September 2026 — 881 subscribers24 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 780–894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 10:16881+44
31 Aug 2026, 11:23837+35
25 Aug 2026, 01:43802+9
24 Aug 2026, 10:46793first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤583.3%
😁116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC246 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/tztmn3 【验证时间】:2026-08-21 【老师名字】:纤纤 【老师账号】:@AhmadRsheed 【验证留名】:圆头耄耋 【人照相似】:6 【颜值身材】:5 【服务评分】:7 【态度评分】:8 【课室环境】:8 【体验过程】:拿到了补贴,兑换了工兵,这就相当于白嫖!于是连夜cj!到了地方老师那绝对是巨乳,胸奴人可以尝试,老师服务态度很好,全程笑嘻嘻的,上面的服务都有,由于天气原因,我就简单出货,快点回家,免得被雨淋。 预览消息(正式发送时没有本行)。

❤1

9 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC≈1,400 views0 reactionsread 24 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-09 【老师】:纤纤 【留名】:青年晚报 【人照】:6 【颜值】:6 【身材】:7 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:7.5 【过程】:意外抽中工兵,台风天才赶回来,冒着大雨出击。教室在新小区,环境很不错,老师态度很好,进门就递上冰水。迅速褪去衣物,老师的大灯格外吸睛,大大滴哈密瓜。接着洗了残废澡,还有水中箫,开始B面服务,指滑,胸推,这大哈密瓜在背面游走可真是别有一番滋味。A面舔胸口完,还有哈密瓜夹火腿肠,鄙人功力不够,没动几下就吃不消了,赶紧戴套开始干活。老师💦还特别多,抓着大灯后入、传教士真的很爽。总得来说,这个价格这个服务这个大哈密瓜,还要什么自行车。

6 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 24 August 2026

【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【老师名字】:纤纤 【老师账号】:@AhmadRsheed 【验证留名】:胖五 【人照相似】:6 【颜值身材】:7 【服务评分】:10 【态度评分】:10 【课室环境】:8 【体验过程】:当时到台州已经过12点了,正好看到老师在群里发有空。联系好以后按照老师指导上门,见面后老师非常热情,由于本人是胸奴人,颜值这块不是重点目标,交过水费以后,确认为真胸!老师认为帮忙洗澡,水中萧,主动擦干非常细致。先B面亲背,没有🐉,转正面,一边享受亲亲,一边玩老师的大胸,老师问是否胸推,必然尝试一下,毕竟不是每个老师都能体会到的。然后戴T上马,姿势换了三四个,出货走人。全程性格温顺,非常享受。 预览消息(正式发送时没有本行)。

6 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,010 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @taizhoumingyuan

评价时间:2026-08-05 评价昵称:公子世无双 老师名字:纤纤 请选择下面的按钮进行评价,也可以复制以下模板补充内容发送发送给我,请不要改动括号里面的内容: 点击下方文字 即可 一键复制 介于之前打分标准不够统一,今天开始工兵报告打分以此图为标准((以后报告会比之前报告评分低1到2分)) 报告模板 【推荐程度】:5(1⭐️拉完了 2⭐️npc. 3⭐️人上人 4⭐️顶级 5⭐️夯) 【所在位置】:上门 【身高身材】:小只 【人照相似】:9 【安全性】: 【修车水费】:9 【凶器罩杯】:E 【颜值打分】: 颜值打分参考图 【出击过程】:老师很棒,不墨迹,约好时间直接上门,就是有点可爱,呆呆的,迷路了,我下去领的,老师很主动,🐍管饱,无雷点,可以满分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:服务很到位,🐻真的大,喜欢的直接无脑冲 这是模板,你可以点击我,直接复制模板!!! 然后点击下方,(点击我 提交报告 选项发送你得…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @qianqian008009. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“纤纤的后花园🌹” (@qianqian008009), 881 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qianqian008009.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.