🎰 上海悠然半价券 📮 参与条件: 🌏️ 归属地 上海,江苏 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-悠然的空间 🎫 加入-野寻·上海学生交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 6 条 🎫 加入-野寻·上海打卡通告群 └ 🔑 发送口令﹝出击悠然宝宝﹞ 🎫 加入-野寻·上海活动公告 🎫 加入-野寻·上海修车档案 ❗ 口令提示: 请先参与抽奖,再发送口令激活 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 悠然P半价券 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖后请24小时内联系悠然老师( @qiqi68692 ),无出击意向不要参与 在3天内完成出击 作业报告向 @chaseshxc_bot 提交 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年10月25日 13时30分00秒

Channel
Nicole
@qiqidkj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-133 since we began measuring on 22 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004409742825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qiqidkj |
| Created | 24 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qiqidkj |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:16 | 3 | -227 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 230 | +66 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 164 | +28 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:22 | 136 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7856.7%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 236
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.299%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (24 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,357 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
可以先给我开视频,验证我的颜值了之后再出发过来
地址在:徐汇区康健路77弄 每天11点到晚上12点。包夜是9点到第二天自然醒。一般12小时以上。
徐汇区康健路77弄
修车总部免费上榜: https://t.me/bjxiuchezb 修车总部综合群:https://t.me/ncnxxnx131 唯一管理员; @xcguanzong
TG抽奖福利中心:https://t.me/hmflzx 🎟️ 抽奖标题:松江悠然:@qiqi68692 抽奖福利活动 📪抽奖说明:中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 💡 活动说明: 1. 中奖者联系:@qiqi68692 2. 自开奖后请在7日内兑奖 3. 炸号者中奖作废 4. 转赠需老师同意 🎫 参与条件: 🎫 加入-悠然的空间 🎫 加入-上海名师天团资源榜 🎫 加入-上海名师天团 🎫 加入-上海名师天团锐评 🎫 加入-上海名师天团福利群 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ P半价券 × 2 📅 开奖时间:2026-10-24 11:00自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/Lottery_2_bot?start=join-L179257121526
💃艺名:悠然 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/38461 ⛳️位置: #闵行区 🙍♂️学生:pp99 ———————————————— 小妹妹刚到上海,地方很好找。妹妹特别嫩,皮肤很光滑,胸很大(比简介里说的大至少c+,第一次见ls把自己胸往小的写)。妹妹的声音也特别好听,总之非常nice
❤1
💃艺名:悠然 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/38461 ⛳️位置: #闵行区 🙍♂️学生:MfcqkisgJmqtuws ———————————————— 提前一小时联系的老师,约好时间后告诉详细的教室地图,开门后发现老师人比照片好看;脸是幼态的,有点偏网红,一进门老师就与我侃侃而谈,隔着裤子给我摸硬了,老师服务态度很好,🐍管够,再加上手法按摩根本把持不住,赶紧让老师缓一缓防止提前发射,老师很是懂事;过程中老师配合度也很高,嘴里骚话不断,甚是欢喜,中场休息老师也能侃侃而谈,情绪价值提供的很到位😋
❤1
👍👍👍【艺术展览会福利群】⬇️ 免费拿5折6折7折优惠 和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包🧧福利 本群专属手势认证高质量老师 上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群 上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+Bc16na5DQI82MDli 上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1 上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+jzWwy36Lm1M0MGEx 展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu 个人推荐频道88🧧 📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot 📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot 📡 投稿报告:@Yszbgbot
Channel name was changed to «悠然的空间»
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @qiqidkj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@shxyls · 88,0022 posts上海修车总部榜
@bjxiuchezb · 31,4061 post野寻·上海活动公告
@chasesh_hdgg · 9,0921 post野寻·上海学生交流群
@chasesh_jlq · 35,0421 post野寻·上海修车档案
@chasesh_lsda · 12,5591 post野寻·上海打卡通告群
@chasesh_tgq · 24,1121 postTG抽奖福利中心
@hmflzx · 8,4981 postLotteryBest抽奖导航
@lotterynav · 193,0641 post上海修车总部综合群
@ncnxxnx131 · 34,1571 post上海名师天团
@sh_m_s_t_t · 24,3341 post上海名师天团资源榜
@sh_ms_b · 22,3821 post上海艺术展览会老师自助广告
@shanghaiyishu · 30,6611 post上海名师天团福利群
@shmsttflq · 5,9041 post上海名师天团锐评
@shmstttg · 6,0571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nicole” (@qiqidkj), 3 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiqidkj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.