
Channel
Qlobal-Change
@qlobal_change
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,945subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001206467584 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qlobal_change |
| Created | 9 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qlobal_change |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 7,945 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 7,956 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 7,956 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 7,968 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 7,971 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 7,973 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 7,990 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 7,998 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 8,000 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 25 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 552,425 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DickerHund · 332 posts🇨🇭Das Beste aus 20 Kanälen🇨🇭
@hallo2Qmin · 8522 postsVideos von Augen Auf Medien Analyse
@AugenAufMAVideos · 8811 postCoronaVirus mit Deutschland < @CoronaVirus_Deutschland >
@CoronaVirus_Deutschland · 941 postEnergija Q
@EnergijaQ · 421 postFranz Miller's Blog | Hot news
@franzmillersblog · 6161 postFür unsere Verfassung und die Menschenwürde
@fuerunsereverfassungunddie · 821 postGarden of Freedom Berlin
@GardenOfFreedomBerlin · 551 post❤️Planetenkinder❤️
@planetenkinder · 461 post#SonnenanPeter Peter-Michael Lutz
@sonnenanpeters · 251 postUNN - Unabhängig-Neutrale Nachrichten
@unabhaengig_neutral · 22,5051 postWachmacher
@wachmacher17 · 741 postWissen ist Macht 2.0
@WIM20 · 51 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DDDDoffiziell · 55,953
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
@MARKmobil · 117,216
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
@TelegramTipsDE · 169,039
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
@QlobalChange · 93,971
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,510
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@lichtweiser · 45,795
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
@LIONMediaNews · 134,719
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@Blickwinkel · 73,969
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@BitchBotBoiiLive · 71,254
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@LIONMediaTV · 105,027
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
@CompactMagazin · 77,560
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@GuteNachrichtenNews · 44,138
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@younity_mee · 60,896
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@soeren_schumann · 59,985
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
@anonymousnews_org · 69,970
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@rabbitresearch · 84,067
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qlobal-Change” (@qlobal_change), 7,945 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qlobal_change.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.