Channel
@quarkddr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,060subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001553073973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quarkddr |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quarkddr |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 1,060 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 1,062 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 1,063 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 1,061 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,062 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 1,068 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 1,069 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 1,068 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,069 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 1,066 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 1,062 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 1,060 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,058 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,058 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
372 reactions across 20 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 100 | 26.9% | |
| 😁 | 65 | 17.5% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 9.14% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 6.45% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 4.84% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 3.76% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 2.96% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 2.96% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.69% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 2.69% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.42% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 1.88% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 1.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.806% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.806% | |
| 13 further kinds | 22 | 5.91% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Eines der größten Kostenrisiken heute ist es, eine Persony zu missgendern. Ens hat da nur einen Versich frei, beim zweiten Fehler hagelt es Bußgelder und Schmerzensgeld. Wir haben Euch Möglichkeiten gekachelt, wie Ihr diese vermeiden könnt, ohne Wahrheiten zu verleugnen.
💯6👍1🙏1
Es ist ein Thema, das bis heute unter Männern tabu ist: Der Schwanz. Denn seien wir ehrlich: Nicht jeder Schwanz ist schön. Es gibt sogar sehr hässliche Schwänze, erst recht, wenn sie ungewaschen sind oder an Frauen oder Geistesgestörten hängen. Wir haben Euch das mal gekachelt
🤡7🍌3🌭2
De-Radikalisierungsgespräche sind nach Messerverbotszonen die nächste Eskalationsstufe des Staates. Es geht darum, einem potentiellen Attentäter für viel Geld klarzumachen, was in unserer offenen und vielfältig-bunten Gesellschaft erlaubt und nicht erlaubt ist.
👍13🤡6🗿2😱2
Neue Männers brauchte das Land, neue Männers hat das Land bekommen. Klug, sensibel und einfühlsam, fast wie Frouwen auf einem Grünen-Parteitag. Wir stellen sie Euch vor, die Männer, die ihn Polizeiberichten erwähnt werden:
🌚7👍6❤1
Er gilt als einer der härtesten, wenn nicht sogar als härtester Moderator dieser Republik. Eloquent und unerbittlich geht er mit knallharten Fragen der Wahrheit auf den Grund. Nur er ist sich gewachsen! Seine neue Show - wir würden die uns (danke, @PublicoMag) ansehen.
😁9🙈3🤡1🤮1
Deutshcland versinkt in einem Meer von Schweiß. Kaum ein Tag vergeht, an dem ein des Schwimmens Unkundiges das rettende Ufer nicht erreicht. Dabei wäre es so einfach, für Abkühlung zu sorgen, ohne dass Menschys in unbekannte Gewässer springen, aber die AfD blockiert ja alles!
🤡9👍6❤2🐳1😁1😱1
Viele Menschys fragen sich ja, was so viele Bürgys bewegt, die Bösens zu wählen. Während die Dummen noch rätseln, haben wir es uns einfach gemacht und schlicht herumgefragt. Und siehe da - die Lösung ist viel einfacher als wir alle erwartet hatten:
😁14👻4👍2❤1💯1😱1
Wichtig für Euch: Falls Ihr bei Facebook seid, könnt Ihr nicht über strittige Themen posten. Das mach die bebrillten Duttträger in den Zensurzentralen fickrig. Nehmt stattdessen doch eines der Themen, die wir hier vorschlagen? Dann klappt’s auch mit der Unzensur!
🔥6🥰5👏4😢1
Das „Zentrum für politische Schönheit, aber auch das „Bundnis widersetzen“ sind voll gegen Gewalt, außer, sie richtet sich gegen Andersdenkende. Da kennen die Organisationen der „gesellschaftlichen Mitte unsererDemokratie“ nix. Grünens, SPD und Linkens auch nix. Auch keine Gnade.
💯18👍9😱1
Wie der gestrige Tag gezeigt hat, ist das größte Problem des sogenannten „Antifaschisten“ nicht der „Faschist“, sondern er selbst. „Antifa“ mag zwar „Handarbeit“ sein, wird aber ohne Dienstwagen und Wecker schnell zur psychischen und physischen Belastung der jungen Leistungslosen
👍15🔥8👏6❤3🤩2
Der Lautsprechende der Grünen Jugend hat es aufgedeckt: Wenn eine Nationalmannschaft beim Elfmeterschießen verliert, dann wird zuerst die Ehefrau weggeboxt. Aber wir in Deutshcland kennen noch andere Strategien der Krisenbewältigung, die wir Euch hier für die EM 2028 kacheln:
👍8🏆4💋3❤🔥1🤡1🤣1😢1
Es ist eine sehr seltsame Diskussion, die derzeit läuft: Finstere Nazihord:Innen behaupten, Deutshcens sei nur, wer Deutshcens ist. Dabei weiß jedens, dass Deutshcens jedens ist, der einen deutshcens Pass hat. Auch, wenn ens vor Gericht ens Übersetzendes braucht.
😁9😱4🗿2🤷♀2👍1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quarkddr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QuarkDDR” (@quarkddr), 1,060 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quarkddr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.