Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𖥔 𝑞𝑤𝑡𝑂𝑂𝑡𝑡 | 16 +

Channel

𖥔 𝑞𝑤𝑡𝑂𝑂𝑡𝑡 | 16 +

@qwt00tttt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,008subscribers

+151 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003846973193
TypeChannel
Username@qwt00tttt
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 4 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qwt00tttt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8572,0081,932.56 August 2026 — 1,857 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,857 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,881 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,008 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 44 days, net +151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,834–2,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:362,008+113
12 Aug 2026, 15:331,895+14
9 Aug 2026, 16:021,881+20
6 Aug 2026, 17:361,861+4
6 Aug 2026, 07:311,857no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:221,857first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,039 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52133208238881729972,01128.6%
1,68523.9%
🍓1,37819.6%
❤‍🔥90912.9%
🕊72910.4%
💘3274.65%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,039 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
115
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qwt00tttt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,190 views300 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧪ʀᴇꜱᴇᴀʀᴄʜ |1️⃣

🕊173🍓72custom 521332082388817299755

1 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC≈2,810 views436 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕊#veil

🍓249custom 5213320823888172997122🕊65

30 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,180 views462 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 5213320823888172997270🕊104🍓88

28 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC≈2,230 views461 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💔

custom 5213320823888172997253123🕊61❤‍🔥16🍓8

27 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC≈2,090 views427 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#eldenring 🤩

custom 5213320823888172997231🍓9575🕊12❤‍🔥10💘4

25 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,990 views426 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

commission 💀

249💘75custom 521332082388817299769🍓17❤‍🔥9🕊7

23 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,210 views411 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

[ SEGMENTS ]

❤‍🔥220🕊78💘70custom 52133208238881729972113🍓9

18 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈3,280 views300 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

art / inspo 🤩🤩

custom 5213320823888172997164❤‍🔥73🍓4314🕊5💘1

18 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC≈2,740 views393 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ver2 #hannibal

212❤‍🔥91custom 521332082388817299756🍓17💘10🕊7

18 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,080 views429 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓224❤‍🔥97🕊60custom 52133208238881729971916💘13

16 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,160 views398 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2026 / 2025

❤‍🔥23681🍓47custom 521332082388817299719🕊8💘7

15 Jul 2026, 23:41 UTC≈2,910 views442 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 #alucard

🍓237custom 521332082388817299710076❤‍🔥18💘6🕊5

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @qwt00tttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𖥔 𝑞𝑤𝑡𝑂𝑂𝑡𝑡 | 16 +” (@qwt00tttt), 2,008 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qwt00tttt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.