Channel
@r_mlp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001080811216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r_mlp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r_mlp |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 334 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 336 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 332 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 331 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 326 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 327 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 328 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 328 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
When did chairs first appear in the show? I watched a video recently that mentioned how the ponies got 'humanized' more in the show and chairs only appeared in later seasons whereas in earlier seasons ponies just stood or sat on the floor with a table/lectern at an appropriate height. So I'm curious, what's the earliest appearance of a chair in the show you can think of? https://redd.it/1vhcoq6 @r_mlp
Peak 3 Minutes Featuring The Princess Of Friendship, Folks! (HAPPY TWILIGHT DAY!!!) https://redd.it/1vh3hcf @r_mlp
Darn it, Pinkie! 😅 https://redd.it/1vh8h8a @r_mlp
Unpopular opinion I'm happy the mane 6 aren't already friends already in g6. I know that sounds weird, but hear me out; In g4, I feel as though Twilight never had to actually befriend these ponies. Sure, she met them in ep 1 and it was alright but then it was like, "Oh, we're all the elements so let's hang out" I know that the rest of them kinda knew each other before Twilight, but she never had a lot of fights or…
Sculpted her based on my little cousin 🩵 https://redd.it/1vgxu5z @r_mlp
Photo, posted without a caption
Gusty The Great Maybe Is one Of Strongest Unicorn Of Her Time https://redd.it/1vgw3xj @r_mlp
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @r_mlp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“r/MyLittlePony” (@r_mlp), 334 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_mlp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.