Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rachel Blevins

Channel

Rachel Blevins

@rachblevins

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

8,725subscribers

-126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411802202
TypeChannel
Username@rachblevins
DescriptionIndependent Journalist. Passionate about pursuing truth and questioning establishment narratives. Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rachelblevins/ Join my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/rachelblevins/ ⛔️ BEWARE OF SCAMMERS ⛔️
Created17 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rachblevins

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,7258,8518,7886 August 2026 — 8,851 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,851 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,850 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,846 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,842 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,845 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,841 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,847 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,846 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,834 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,826 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,812 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,804 subscribers2 October 2026 — 8,783 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,772 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,765 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,770 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,759 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,758 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,747 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,742 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,737 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,729 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,725 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 94 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,706–8,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 03:078,725-4
4 Nov 2026, 22:078,729-8
1 Nov 2026, 20:448,737-5
29 Oct 2026, 16:518,742-5
26 Oct 2026, 06:598,747-11
22 Oct 2026, 20:218,758-1
19 Oct 2026, 21:348,759-11
17 Oct 2026, 04:418,770+5
13 Oct 2026, 20:388,765-7
8 Oct 2026, 07:368,772-11
2 Oct 2026, 02:588,783-21
16 Sept 2026, 08:558,804-8
13 Sept 2026, 00:408,812-14
8 Sept 2026, 16:558,826-8
3 Sept 2026, 13:578,834-12
30 Aug 2026, 23:448,846-1
27 Aug 2026, 14:478,847+6
25 Aug 2026, 00:238,841-4
21 Aug 2026, 19:188,845+3
15 Aug 2026, 20:238,842first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 8,725 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held53 (31 May 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total6,600
Reactions total162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈338
Videos
≈1,000
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 01s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,246 reactions across 53 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,72753.2%
❤1,12534.7%
👏2989.18%
🤬371.14%
🤣341.05%
😁110.339%
😢100.308%
👎40.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Oct 2026, 20:45 UTC≈2,130 views56 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Trump thinks he can threaten to use the 'Mother Of All Bombs' and Iran will stand down. But as Journalist Elijah Magnier noted, the MOAB is NO MATCH for Iran's granite mountains. Tehran knows it has the leverage, which is why it is SINKING tankers being escorted by the US... https://youtu.be/0sLpqUTh4ks

👍42👏5🤬4❤3👎2

15 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,980 views45 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Saudi Arabia is becoming increasingly desperate, amid Ansar Allah's strikes on the Riyadh Airport and Saudi Aramco HQ. Kevork Almassian, host of Syriana Analysis, noted the US and Israel are trying to push KSA to its knees, to force it into "normalization" with the Zionist entity. https://youtu.be/cMLfNJ08iuE

👍25❤12👏6👎1🤬1

10 Oct 2026, 21:10 UTC≈2,490 views61 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Trump lashes out at Zelensky, and puts pressure on Europe to further carry the torch for Ukraine support… all while ignoring the fact that the U.S. is still supplying the satellite data for Kiev to carry out strikes on Russian oil refineries... https://youtu.be/4jyY2M87SmU

👍36❤16👏5😁3🤬1

7 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC≈2,720 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026

After 3 years of genocide and silence from governments across Asia, Turkey and Pakistan are racing to help… Saudi Arabia. Journalist Laith Marouf noted the 'Mecca Defense Pact' is doomed to FAIL, as Ansar Allah works to liberate ALL of Yemen. https://youtu.be/5L_NHu8Mi_E

❤32👍12👏4🤬1

7 Oct 2026, 13:53 UTC≈2,230 views47 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Russia is increasing strikes across Ukraine, as NATO continues to show it has no plans for de-escalation. Col. Doug Macgregor noted that Putin "taking the gloves off" is proof he's listening to the Russian people... https://youtu.be/kQ4XvR2kIlo

👍35❤7👏3🤣1🤬1

7 Oct 2026, 03:43 UTC≈1,890 views42 reactionsread 8 November 2026

The Saudis are back to bombing Yemen, and the US is back to refueling their warplanes. Prof. John Mearsheimer noted that Saudi Arabia's return to war in Yemen is "a fool’s errand" that could soon become the next front of the US vs. Iran war… https://youtu.be/b3julGS4qbk

👍28❤10👏2🤬1😢1

6 Oct 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,620 views48 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Russia is unleashing a new phase of war on Kiev, and putting its new jet-powered Geran drones to use. International Relations and Security Analyst Mark Sleboda noted that while NATO wanted to "bring the war home" to Moscow… it's now Russia who is bringing the war home to Kiev. https://youtu.be/1zk8D7ANcFg

❤29👍16👏2🤬1

5 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,720 views46 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Ansar Allah declared a “No-Fly Zone” over Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom escalated its attacks on Yemen. Journalist Robert Inlakesh noted Saudi Arabia is fighting “ISRAEL’S WAR,” and appears to be fighting it to “to the last drop of oil.” https://youtu.be/M-g6-RvO0Eo

❤28👍13👏4🤬1

4 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈1,850 views70 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Russia is now going after Kiev's North and South bridges over the Dnieper River, with the Russian Defense Ministry warning that Zelensky “bears FULL responsibility” for the increased strikes, after he announced plans to target Russian oil refineries... https://youtu.be/-nTdbnYFupo

❤31👍28👏10🤬1

17 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC≈3,480 views63 reactionsread 8 November 2026

The Yemenis are unleashing strikes on military and energy targets inside Saudi Arabia, and even shooting down F-15s. Journalist Laith Marouf noted MBS is desperate as he fails to find support, while continuing to be a vassal for the US and Israel. https://youtu.be/9dowX4Ru6jw

❤36👍22👏4🤬1

15 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC≈3,070 views52 reactionsread 8 November 2026

The US may have spent $22 BILLION+ on ammunition in its illegal war against Iran, but the COST is far greater—especially when you take the ECONOMIC impact into account. Prof. Seyed Mohammad Marandi noted the US failed to strangle Iran, and now IRAN is calling the shots. https://youtu.be/3N1QbuWqQBU

👍36❤12👏4

14 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈2,860 views55 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Yemeni forces liberated the Red Sea coastline in a major offensive that saw Saudi-backed mercenaries fleeing at a record pace. Journalist Esteban Carrillo noted the Saudis are getting a reality check as their oil exports vanish and the US refuses to come to their aid. https://youtu.be/g9Xmz1UjL4w

❤36👏16👍2😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @rachblevins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
@brianlovethailand · 40,696
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,484
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Dan Kovalik
@danielmkovalik · 38,881
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q111317594 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelRachel Blevins
X / Twitter@RachBlevins
Official sitehttps://rachelblevins.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rachel Blevins” (@rachblevins), 8,725 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rachblevins.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.