На данный момент по обстановке тихо При возникновении непосредственной угрозы оповестим немедленно. Берегите себя и своих близких! ❗️Радар Екатеринбург и Свердловская область - @radar_ekaterinburgg 🌐 Обход белых списков - @Internet_Boost_bot
Views per post sit far above this size band
25,500 average views per post against 33,064 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.0%. Across the 8,375 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.03% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
| Window | 30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 54 of 54 published in the window (0 exact, 54 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,375,530 |
| Mature posts only | 78.2% over 51 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 33,064 measured 26 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,375 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.03% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.176th percentile · 7.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.015% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
