![Telegram profile photo for –Sutcliffe's palace.🥩]"](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/34/345fc1168ce4dd97688f01f571260e5091dd5c16bd8c4006896f0e971aa0d0bf.jpg)
Channel
@rafcoser
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
73subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002817023786 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rafcoser |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rafcoser |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 73 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 75 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 73 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 70 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 70 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
148 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5296768864468624560 | 22 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5386841892103153135 | 19 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5274031831589602968 | 18 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5395519512747450963 | 17 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5287406643217207076 | 13 | 8.78% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 6.08% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 4.05% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 2.03% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.03% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🗝 ⭐️✒️✒️✒️✒️⭐️⭐️ 🗝 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🏹Link: 🔗 Repost?🖤🖤
❤4custom 52967688644686245602custom 53868418921031531352custom 52874066432172070761
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Приїхали лінзи для наступного косплею, залишилося дочекатися перуку 😶🌫
❤5💘2custom 52874066432172070761custom 52967688644686245601custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
🎀 🤩 💛💛 🤩🎀 🤩 🤩𝑯𝒆𝒃𝒊 𝑯𝒆𝒃𝒊🤩 🤩 ᴱᵁᴿᴼᴾᴬ ᶜᴼˢᴾᴸᴬʸ ᶜᵁᴾ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚣𝚘 𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 ⭐️⭐️
custom 53955195127474509634custom 52967688644686245603custom 53868418921031531352custom 52740318315896029681custom 52874066432172070761
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Evil reptilian 💗
❤🔥4❤2custom 53868418921031531352custom 52740318315896029681custom 52874066432172070761custom 52967688644686245601custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Ще й Віла треба переробити і кудись подати. Були б тільки осінні/зимні фестивалі десь поруч💔
🔥5💔2❤🔥1custom 52740318315896029681custom 52967688644686245601custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Вже три косплани з ідену 😱 (На цей та наступний рік)
custom 52967688644686245603❤2❤🔥1💔1custom 52740318315896029681custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🎀🎀🎀🖤 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐☑️☑️☑️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🎀🎀🎀 — 𝓚𝔂𝓻𝓲𝓮, 𝓯𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓼. 𝓚𝔂𝓻𝓲𝓮, 𝓘𝓰𝓷𝓲𝓼 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓮, 𝓔𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓷🤩 🌸ᴾʰᵒᵗᵒᵍʳᵃᵖʰᵉʳ🌸 ⤵︎ Пост в і͟н͟с͟т͟а͟г͟р͟а͟м͟м͟і͟ Repost🤩🖤
❤3custom 52740318315896029683❤🔥1💘1custom 52967688644686245601custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Are you patriotic? Hell yes I am 🦅🇺🇸 Користуюся деякими рецептами та кожного разу дивую себе тим, як я можу готувати.
❤5custom 52967688644686245602🔥1custom 52740318315896029681custom 52874066432172070761custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Заграв лав крайм, навіть жити захотілось
custom 52740318315896029683custom 52967688644686245603custom 52874066432172070762custom 53868418921031531352💘1custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Подобаються люди з високим рівнем емоційного інтелекту, уважні, розумні, терплячі та ті, що поважають особисті кордони (це особливо важливо). Якщо ще й розвинена емпатія, то взагалі супер. З того, що не подобається - це, авжеж, абсолютно плоскі люди, які й не бажають якось збільшувати свій кругозір - це мені просто не цікаво, не моє. А от величезний червоний флаг це коли людина при розмові систематично перебиває та/а…
custom 52740318315896029685custom 53955195127474509633💘2custom 52874066432172070762custom 52967688644686245601custom 53868418921031531351
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Що вам подобається та не подобається в людях?
custom 52874066432172070762custom 52967688644686245602custom 53868418921031531352❤🔥1custom 52740318315896029681custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Ура, гофрувати перуки, моє улюблене🎉
💅3❤2🔥1custom 52740318315896029681custom 52874066432172070761custom 52967688644686245601custom 53868418921031531351custom 53955195127474509631
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞 – 🥩
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @rafcoser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“–Sutcliffe's palace.🥩]"” (@rafcoser), 73 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rafcoser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.