Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ragalik

Channel

Ragalik

@ragaliksmokescrypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,173subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001845071998
TypeChannel
Username@ragaliksmokescrypto
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ragaliksmokescrypto

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0881,1741,1317 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,160 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,159 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,172 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,174 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,172 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,173 subscribers1,1737 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,075–1,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:151,173+1
14 Sept 2026, 14:011,172-2
11 Sept 2026, 00:411,174+2
6 Sept 2026, 02:151,172+13
2 Sept 2026, 01:571,159-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:581,160+5
26 Aug 2026, 11:041,155+45
23 Aug 2026, 03:081,110+6
20 Aug 2026, 01:021,104-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:531,107+18
10 Aug 2026, 15:121,089+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:471,088no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:171,088first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1836.7%
🤣1428.6%
❤‍🔥714.3%
👏510.2%
👍36.12%
24.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Попробуем сначала по старому тз поработать на основе опыта старого знакомого и твиттер инфлов. Параллельно затестим, что ружик расскажет

2 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC694 viewsread 7 August 2026

С понедельника ставлю мекс с рейт лимитом, акки -пнл либо просто хорошая торговая активность % как всегда лучший, средний 47 на них дают, дам больше спокойно. @ragal1k_3 пишите Ставил в тест один акк в четверг, 2к напринтило

2 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC639 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С бингами больше не работаю, принтит слабо Давал почти в 2 раза больше %, чем другие инфлы (30% по снг средний)

1 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC645 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

пишут не открывало, через терминал кто-то пробовал ?

😁2

1 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC626 viewsread 7 August 2026

не успел депнуть https://www.lbank.com/ru/futures/giggleusdt

1 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC597 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

можно было не кидать в целом 😁

😁13

1 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC641 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрим 👀 6459, а не 6500, извиняюсь за пиздешь

❤‍🔥71

31 Jul 2026, 02:53 UTC≈2,610 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

История скама на 40к$+ от лудочейн Как меня наебали на 14к$ свои же 😁 Многие знают, что прошлым летом было дао «Лунтик Фунтик » от лудочейн. Изначально там были Борис и Егор, я. Мы троем начинали по сути с 0, с пару к$ банком. Во время битка, когда шел дикий фарм, мы лутали 1-3к в день. Банки к тому времени позволяли работать без остановки и клипать акки. Пишет мне Борис: «брат, зайди ликвы акки в рк, биток фл

🤣11👏5👍31

31 Jul 2026, 01:54 UTC928 viewsread 7 August 2026

кто первый 777 выбьет еще дам под этим постом

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ragaliksmokescrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ragalik” (@ragaliksmokescrypto), 1,173 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ragaliksmokescrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.