Ну что-ж. Наконец-то спустя 17 дней реализовали задумку. Показываю?
❤53

Channel
@rageprjct
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
12,431subscribers
-372 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002056697288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rageprjct |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rageprjct |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 12,431 | -15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 12,446 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 12,463 | -24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 12,487 | -19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 12,506 | -26 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 12,532 | -17 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 12,549 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 12,572 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 12,586 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 12,598 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 12,606 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 12,618 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 12,628 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 12,631 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 12,639 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 12,647 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 12,660 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 12,674 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 12,685 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 12,697 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (6 March 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 771 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
870 reactions across 27 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 653 | 75.1% | |
| custom 5190414251470121840 | 177 | 20.3% | |
| 💔 | 40 | 4.60% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну что-ж. Наконец-то спустя 17 дней реализовали задумку. Показываю?
❤53
Образец в процессе: пока конструктор будет делать лекала (схему кроя для пошива полупальто для фабрики), я подбираю материалы, фурнитуру и прочее для прототипа. Уже после этого фабрика сошьет прототип и можно будет показать что получилось в живую в эти выходные. И после уже будет закрытый предзаказ на пару дней по сниженной цене перед основным релизом, который будет позже.
❤19
Какое полупальто делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤12
FW26 SHORT COAT V2 Новый концепт дизайна с ассиметричным бортом со скрытой застежкой изнутри. Что думаете, какой делаем?
❤27
Делаем полупальто?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10
RAGE PROJECT FW26 SHORT COAT Концепт укороченного пальто на температуру от +15 до -5 градусов. Желание разработать полупальто было еще прошлой весной, но тогда не срослось, а стоит ли реализовывать сейчас — зависит от вашего мнения.
❤36
Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8
RAGE PROJECT FW26 LEATHER JACKET Концепт утепленной кожаной курточки с ассиметричной молнией и высоким, свободным горлом. Regular fit, не узко и не слишком широко. Унисекс. Что думаете, делаем или нет? Хочу сделать доступный ценник в районе 10-12 тысяч.
❤25
Чуть-чуть реакций накиньте и покажу новую курточку.
❤68
SUMMER SALE — последние штаны по сниженной цене 3600₽. rageproject.net
❤31
Прямо сейчас работаю над разработкой FW26, жду ваши идеи что хотите на эту осень-зиму. Let's go.
❤31
Что изменилось в бренде после 4-х месяцев без новой одежды: 1. Как создатель проекта понял уже в новый 52 раз, что многие вещи, что мы с командой делали до этого — были неправильными, так что пересмотрел подход к делу 2. Внутренний кризис бренда не оставлял выбора, поэтому временно пришлось распустить команду с которой мы работали последний год, все начинается «с нуля» 3. Обновили дизайн сайта на приличный — ragep…
❤59💔9
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @rageprjct. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое полупальто делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Делаем полупальто?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что хотите на лето?
The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAGE PROJECT” (@rageprjct), 12,431 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rageprjct.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.