Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RAGE PROJECT

Channel

RAGE PROJECT

@rageprjct

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,431subscribers

-372 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002056697288
TypeChannel
Username@rageprjct
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rageprjct

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,43112,80312,61712 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,802 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,784 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,749 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,743 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,738 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,724 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,708 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,697 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,685 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,674 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,660 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,639 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,631 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,628 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,618 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,606 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,598 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,586 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,572 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,549 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,532 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,506 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,487 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,463 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,446 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,431 subscribers12 August 202618 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 37 days, net -372. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,375–12,859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:1512,431-15
16 Sept 2026, 10:2012,446-17
14 Sept 2026, 12:4112,463-24
12 Sept 2026, 23:2012,487-19
11 Sept 2026, 00:2112,506-26
7 Sept 2026, 23:2212,532-17
5 Sept 2026, 00:3512,549-23
3 Sept 2026, 05:5412,572-14
1 Sept 2026, 21:3712,586-12
1 Sept 2026, 00:4712,598-8
31 Aug 2026, 00:3612,606-12
30 Aug 2026, 00:0312,618-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:3812,628-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:2812,631-8
27 Aug 2026, 04:1812,639-8
26 Aug 2026, 01:2812,647-13
24 Aug 2026, 22:4712,660-14
23 Aug 2026, 09:0712,674-11
21 Aug 2026, 20:1812,685-12
20 Aug 2026, 20:1512,697first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.20%
avg views ÷ 12,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
771
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held27 (6 March 20261 September 2026)
Views total771
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

870 reactions across 27 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65375.1%
custom 519041425147012184017720.3%
💔404.60%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC771 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ну что-ж. Наконец-то спустя 17 дней реализовали задумку. Показываю?

53

19 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,970 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Образец в процессе: пока конструктор будет делать лекала (схему кроя для пошива полупальто для фабрики), я подбираю материалы, фурнитуру и прочее для прототипа. Уже после этого фабрика сошьет прототип и можно будет показать что получилось в живую в эти выходные. И после уже будет закрытый предзаказ на пару дней по сниженной цене перед основным релизом, который будет позже.

19

14 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,630 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Какое полупальто делаем?

  1. Прошлый дизайн33%
  2. Новый дизайн67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12

14 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,420 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

FW26 SHORT COAT V2 Новый концепт дизайна с ассиметричным бортом со скрытой застежкой изнутри. Что думаете, какой делаем?

27

13 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈2,220 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Делаем полупальто?

  1. Да, взял бы71%
  2. Скорее нет29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10

13 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,130 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

RAGE PROJECT FW26 SHORT COAT Концепт укороченного пальто на температуру от +15 до -5 градусов. Желание разработать полупальто было еще прошлой весной, но тогда не срослось, а стоит ли реализовывать сейчас — зависит от вашего мнения.

36

12 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,950 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Делаем?

  1. Делаем, взял бы за такой ценник43%
  2. Не знаю, скорее нет57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8

12 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,130 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

RAGE PROJECT FW26 LEATHER JACKET Концепт утепленной кожаной курточки с ассиметричной молнией и высоким, свободным горлом. Regular fit, не узко и не слишком широко. Унисекс. Что думаете, делаем или нет? Хочу сделать доступный ценник в районе 10-12 тысяч.

25

10 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,110 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Чуть-чуть реакций накиньте и покажу новую курточку.

68

10 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,180 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

SUMMER SALE — последние штаны по сниженной цене 3600₽. rageproject.net

31

31 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈3,160 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Прямо сейчас работаю над разработкой FW26, жду ваши идеи что хотите на эту осень-зиму. Let's go.

31

18 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,630 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Что изменилось в бренде после 4-х месяцев без новой одежды: 1. Как создатель проекта понял уже в новый 52 раз, что многие вещи, что мы с командой делали до этого — были неправильными, так что пересмотрел подход к делу 2. Внутренний кризис бренда не оставлял выбора, поэтому временно пришлось распустить команду с которой мы работали последний год, все начинается «с нуля» 3. Обновили дизайн сайта на приличный — ragep

59💔9

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @rageprjct. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTCAnonymous Poll421 voters

Какое полупальто делаем?

  1. Прошлый дизайн33%
  2. Новый дизайн67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTCAnonymous Poll412 voters

Делаем полупальто?

  1. Да, взял бы71%
  2. Скорее нет29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTCAnonymous Poll319 voters

Делаем?

  1. Делаем, взял бы за такой ценник43%
  2. Не знаю, скорее нет57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 07:29 UTCAnonymous Poll747 voters

Что хотите на лето?

  1. лёгкий лонгслив с открытой спиной23%
  2. лонгслив из лёгкой ткани с воротником на пуговицах и капюшоном15%
  3. футболку25%
  4. льняные штаны23%
  5. легкие сырые джинсы18%
  6. легкую зипку30%
  7. кожаную сумку17%
  8. что-то кружевное38%
  9. я мальчик, поэтому не отвечаю, жду свой опрос30%

The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RAGE PROJECT” (@rageprjct), 12,431 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rageprjct.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.