۲۳۱ نفر دیدن ۱۳ تا رای ؟!
❤3❤🔥3🎉3💯3

Channel
@rahaeebato
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
610subscribers
+148 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002632776688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahaeebato |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahaeebato |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 610 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:23 | 614 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 614 | +102 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 512 | +9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 503 | +47 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 456 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 496 | +34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 462 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 719 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
301 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 24.3% | |
| 💯 | 45 | 15.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 13.0% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 11.3% | |
| 🎉 | 30 | 9.97% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 8.31% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 4.98% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 4.98% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 2.66% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.66% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.664% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.664% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.332% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۲۳۱ نفر دیدن ۱۳ تا رای ؟!
❤3❤🔥3🎉3💯3
️ اپیزود پنجم | ترس از طرد شدن تا حالا شده آنقدر از دست دادن یک آدم بترسی که خودت را در رابطه فراموش کنی؟ آنقدر مراقب حرف زدنت باشی که مبادا ناراحت شود… آنقدر کوتاه بیایی که مبادا فاصله بگیرد… آنقدر خودت را تغییر بدهی که مبادا دیگر دوستت نداشته باشد… گاهی ترس از طرد شدن، خیلی آرام وارد زندگی ما میشود؛ آنقدر آرام که حتی متوجه نمیشویم بعضی انتخابهایمان از روی علاقه نیست، از روی ترس است. ترس از تنها ماندن. ت…
❤4❤🔥3🎉3💯3👍1
File, posted without a caption
❤4❤🔥4🎉2💯2
دکتر پست جدید گذاشتن حتما ببینید✨🌸 پستی که هر هنرمندی ببینه ذوق میکنه ✨ اینستا: Faezehzareee
❤3🎉3💯3❤🔥2
بعضی گرهها با دست باز نمیشوند؛ باید کسی بلد باشد کجای ذهن را لمس کند. 🖤 «رهایی با تو» جاییست برای حرفهایی که شاید هیچوقت نتوانستی درست بیانشان کنی؛ برای سؤالهایی که بیجواب ماندند، احساساتی که اسم نداشتند، و ذهنی که گاهی بیشتر از خودت خسته است. اینجا قرار نیست فقط حرف بشنوی؛ قرار است چیزهایی را درباره خودت کشف کنی که قبلاً نمیدیدی. 🎙️ پادکست رهایی با تو گاهی یک آگاهی، آغازِ یک رهاییست.🪷✨🦋
❤🔥5❤4🎉2👍1💯1🦄1
از یک تا ۱۰ چه نمره ای به پادکست ها میدید 🙂✍🏻؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤16👍15💯14🤩10❤🔥9🎉9🔥9🥰6
دکتر پست جدید گذاشتن حتما ببینید✨🌸 پستی عالی و مفید ✨ اینستا: Faezehzareee
❤4⚡1❤🔥1👍1👏1💯1🔥1
گاهی فقط یک تصمیم کوچیک کافیه تا مسیرت تغییر کنه… 🤍 اگر اینجایی، یعنی برای حال خوبت، شناخت خودت و ساختن یک نسخه بهتر از خودت قدمی برداشتی. 🌱 عضویت در این کانال شاید فقط یک کلیک بوده باشه، اما میتونه شروع یکی از بهترین تصمیمهای زندگیت باشه؛ جایی برای یاد گرفتن، آگاهتر شدن و نزدیکتر شدن به خودِ واقعیات. ✨ خوش اومدی به اینجا؛ جایی که حال خوب، از شناخت خودت شروع میشه. 🕊️
👍13❤12💯12🔥11❤🔥10🎉8🥰7🤩5
پادکست رهایی باتو برای کسی مفید بود؟ کمکی بهش کرده ؟✨🪷
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💯4👍2🔥2⚡1❤1❤🔥1👏1
اگر فکر میکنید کسی به آرامش، امید یا یک شروع تازه نیاز دارد، این پادکست را به او معرفی کنید. شاید همین معرفی، مسیر زندگیاش را تغییر دهد. 🤍 ID:@Rahaeebato
👏2💯2🔥2🤝2⚡1❤1❤🔥1👍1
سلام دوستان عزیز... 🌱 دکتر خیلی زود، پرقدرتتر از قبل کنار شما برمیگردن و مسیری که قراره باهاشون شروع بشه، میتونه پر از یادگیری، رشد و فرصتهای ارزشمند باشه. قدر این فرصت رو بدونید. پیدا کردن روانشناسی که با صبر، احترام و بدون قضاوت به حرفهاتون گوش بده، واقعاً ساده نیست. ایشون از اون آدمهایی هستن که میتونید ساعتها باهاشون صحبت کنید، بدون اینکه احساس کنید باید از خودتون دفاع کنید یا نگران قضاوت شدن باشید. با…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rahaeebato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
از یک تا ۱۰ چه نمره ای به پادکست ها میدید 🙂✍🏻؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پادکست رهایی باتو برای کسی مفید بود؟ کمکی بهش کرده ؟✨🪷
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پادکست رهایی باتو” (@rahaeebato), 610 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahaeebato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.