Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rahantom

Channel

Rahantom

@rahantom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,934subscribers

+380 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002611297082
TypeChannel
Username@rahantom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rahantom

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5543,9343,74413 August 2026 — 3,554 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,578 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,636 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,738 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,748 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,807 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,827 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,867 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,854 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,895 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,911 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,934 subscribers13 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net +380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,497–3,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:403,934+23
15 Sept 2026, 06:163,911+16
11 Sept 2026, 13:153,895+41
6 Sept 2026, 12:383,854-13
1 Sept 2026, 17:043,867+40
29 Aug 2026, 13:263,827+20
26 Aug 2026, 09:113,807+59
23 Aug 2026, 14:083,748+10
20 Aug 2026, 04:383,738+102
17 Aug 2026, 11:563,636+58
14 Aug 2026, 00:133,578+24
13 Aug 2026, 14:013,554first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,263 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,20453.2%
🤣44919.8%
👍1627.16%
💔1446.36%
🤝1275.61%
💘723.18%
🔥431.90%
🌭130.574%
🗿100.442%
👌70.309%
👏60.265%
🍌50.221%
😎50.221%
🤩50.221%
🍓40.177%
😭40.177%
🐳10.044%
💯10.044%
🥰10.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC647 views146 reactionsread 13 August 2026

بعضی از آهنگارو دلم میخواد با صدای اونقدر بلند گوش بدم که شیشه های خونمون بریزه پایین

🤝126👌7🌭65🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,080 views320 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

یکی از بچه های هنرمند چنل عکسمو کشیده امروز صبح دیدم چشام از حدقه زد بیرون از ذوق واقعا ممنونممم ❤️❤️❤️❤️

265🔥41🤩5🍓4💘2🐳1💯1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC968 views70 reactionsread 13 August 2026

چون اوایل هر دو طرف حاضرن برای شروع رابطه هزینه بدن تا یه چیزی بدست بیارن ولی بعد از گذشت یه مدت دیگه پرداخت همون هزینه براشون منطقی به نظر نمیاد چون قرار نیست در ازاش چیزی بدست بیارن فقط میخوان یه چیزی رو از دست ندن

👍5811👏1

13 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC974 views71 reactionsread 13 August 2026

تو رابطه هم اتفاقا این موضوع خیلی واضح دیده میشه وقتی یه رفتار بد رو اوایل نادیده می‌گیری در واقع داری همون محاسبه ی اشتباه رو انجام میدی درد روبرو شدن باهاش الان بیشتر از چیزیه که فعلا تحمل میکنم مشکل اینجاست که اون رفتار با گذشت زمان ضعیف نمیشه قوی‌تر و عادی‌تر میشه و بعد از یه نقطه‌ای اصلاحش تقریبا غیرممکن میشه

63👍6👏2

13 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC958 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026

فکر میکنم بیشتر وقت ها هم این اشتباه از سر نادونی نیست بلکه با هدف مدیریت درد چشمشون رو روی حقیقت می‌بندن یعنی می‌دونن ولی فعلا نمی‌خوان کامل باهاش طرف بشن

65👏1

13 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC938 views72 reactionsread 13 August 2026

مشکل اینجاست که این محاسبه بیشتر وقتا اشتباه از آب درمیاد چون حقیقت دیر یا زود بالاخره خودش رو نشون ‌میده و وقتی نشون بده هم راجع به اصل موضوع آسیب دیدی هم زمانی که از دست دادی

67👍5

13 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC937 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026

این کار هم معمولا از یه محاسبه شروع میشه اینکه اگه الان حقیقت رو بپذیرم دردش بیشتر از چیزیه که الان دارم تحمل می‌کنم

75

13 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC941 views93 reactionsread 13 August 2026

بعضی وقتا دیگران به ما دروغ نمی‌گن خودمون عمدا حقیقت رو نادیده میگیریم

👍8013

13 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC934 views74 reactionsread 13 August 2026

چیزی که متوجه میشم از دسته ای از خاطرات و پیام های بچه ها اینه که خیلیاش یه فرمول ثابت داره گفتم یه توضیح کوتاه بدم شاید بدرد یکی خورد

74

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,410 views234 reactionsread 13 August 2026

آره خیلی یه روانشناس داریم دائم داره فال میگیره یه فیزیوتراپم داریم بهش میگن کمرم درد میکنه میگه میدونم

🤣213🌭7🍌5🗿4😭32

11 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,390 views130 reactionsread 13 August 2026

گپ از ما بهترون خوش مگذرههه؟

💔110👍13😎51😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rahantom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rahantom” (@rahantom), 3,934 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahantom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.