Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RAIDEX

Channel

RAIDEX

@raidexlk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

569subscribers

-460 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002932037916
TypeChannel
Username@raidexlk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/raidexlk

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5691,0297996 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,019 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,020 subscribers18 August 2026 — 830 subscribers25 August 2026 — 585 subscribers31 August 2026 — 577 subscribers9 September 2026 — 576 subscribers17 September 2026 — 569 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 41 days, net -460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 500–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:01569-7
9 Sept 2026, 09:36576-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:58577-8
25 Aug 2026, 03:17585-245
18 Aug 2026, 13:42830-190
15 Aug 2026, 18:111,020+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:561,019-8
9 Aug 2026, 20:511,027-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:301,028-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:311,029first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

206 reactions across 19 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3517.0%
💋125.83%
🔥115.34%
😁115.34%
👍94.37%
🍓73.40%
🤓73.40%
🍾62.91%
🤔62.91%
👏52.43%
😨52.43%
41.94%
🌚41.94%
🎃41.94%
🖕41.94%
😎41.94%
😐41.94%
🤨41.94%
🤩41.94%
🫡41.94%
32 further kinds5627.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC16 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @GODxALLorg

SHOWMATCH📺 RAİDEX 🇹🇷 VS ? 1.MATCH : ? 2.MATCH : ? WINNER🏆- ? Players 1-10 (666, STEREO, GATOR, MADNESS, JESUS) 📩 @Afkfor

2👏1🤨1🦄1🙏1

Signed rx

3 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

paid match vs DEMON🇺🇸 ✅

🎄1👾1💅1😇1😎1

Signed taha

30 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC353 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

With my brother ZANE🇹🇷 @alwaysandforeverx1

💋21❤‍🔥1🌚1🤓1🦄1😁1

Signed Taha

29 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC223 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔2😢2🌚1🤓1🤷1

Signed rai

20 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC514 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs FROZEN🇯🇴 2-0 🌍N1 〽️

1🌚1🔥1🥱1🥴1😎1🙏1

Signed raidex1

8 Jul 2026, 23:50 UTC735 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs KOSHMAR🇷🇺 1-0 🌍N1

3🤷‍♂2🎃1🤝1🤯1🦄1

Signed raidex1

7 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTC654 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs CODE7🇫🇷 1-0 🌍N1

👨‍💻2🙊21👀1💅1🔥1🤔1

Signed raidex2

6 Jul 2026, 22:57 UTC845 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs ARASO🏳️‍🌈 1-0 🌍N3

🎃3😐3🤗1🤣1

Signed raidex2

5 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC677 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs QEVO🇪🇬 1-0 🌍N1

😁4🖕3🔥2😎21👎1🤨1

Signed raidex2

3 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,000 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs 90FPS🇹🇷 1-0 🌍N1

👍54🍓4💋3😍3🔥2🏆1👎1

Signed raidex1

26 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC983 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs SANKE🇹🇷 🌍N3

5🫡4🤔3🍓1💋1🤗1😭1

Signed RAIDEX

24 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC873 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

vs KABUS🇸🇾 1-0 🌍N4

32🤨2💅1💋1🖕1😐1😘1

Signed RAIDEX

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @raidexlk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RAIDEX” (@raidexlk), 569 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raidexlk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.