Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for рамиз.txt

Channel

рамиз.txt

@ramiz_txt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,819subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309424658
TypeChannel
Username@ramiz_txt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ramiz_txt

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8091,8261,817.55 August 2026 — 1,810 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,810 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,812 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,814 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,826 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,825 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,821 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,819 subscribers1,8195 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,806–1,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:591,819-2
11 Sept 2026, 17:551,821-4
7 Sept 2026, 04:571,825-1
2 Sept 2026, 14:541,826+2
30 Aug 2026, 07:461,824-2
27 Aug 2026, 15:261,826+3
24 Aug 2026, 04:371,823+3
20 Aug 2026, 22:531,820+2
18 Aug 2026, 05:531,818+4
14 Aug 2026, 23:171,814+2
12 Aug 2026, 00:181,812+3
9 Aug 2026, 06:431,809-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:501,810no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:591,810first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

897 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44049.1%
😁12313.7%
🤣697.69%
💯687.58%
❤‍🔥465.13%
🔥343.79%
🥴212.34%
👎192.12%
🍌111.23%
👍91.00%
😢91.00%
🗿60.669%
💩40.446%
😈40.446%
😐40.446%
🤝40.446%
30.334%
💊30.334%
😍30.334%
🙏30.334%
8 further kinds141.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC420 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рекомендация для тех, кто посмотрел Нолановскую «Одиссею» и хочет копнуть глубже С предысторией. Какое-то время назад мне написал Камал, который ведёт канал «БукваМесто». Там он пишет про всякие умные штуки вроде античной литературы Камал поинтересовался делаю ли я рекламу у себя в канале, а я подзавязал с этой темой. Потому что после рекламы начинают отписываться прикольные люди. Мне от этого грустняво, потому что

7🔥53

20 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC667 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новая глава паразитирования на названиях успешных хорроров Теперь «Орудия» добавились к списку «Астралов», «Заклятий», «Проклятий» и всяческих «Оменов» Впереди «Обсессии» и «Закулисья реальности»

14🔥4👍1

10 Jul 2026, 05:32 UTC935 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Высота, к которой я стремлюсь в линкедине

😁109👎7👍1🤣1

8 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC≈11,000 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Везде я вижу: — Я автоматизировал всю работу по контенту с помощью Claude. Вот несколько простых промтов, которые заменят вам... Моя реакция: — Ой да иди в пизду Иногда я вижу: — Я леплю пластилиновых человечков, потом я их крашу, фоткаю, анимирую и вот такое забавное видео получается Моя реакция: — Ух ты, покажи ещё

54💯16❤‍🔥6🫡3🤝1

22 Apr 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,400 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В этом месяце мы потратили на туалетную бумагу больше тысячи долларов. Я никогда не был так горд за команду

🤣27😁4🖕2

11 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,710 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня чекал свои старые презентации и внезапно осознал, что я — нейросеть

😁587

26 Feb 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,000 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не кормить пользователей говном как конкурентное преимущество У меня такая простая мысль для вас сегодня. Чисто для разгончика контентных мышц Проходят времена, когда можно сгенерить видео или, боже упаси, картинку через нейросети и тем самым удивить пользователя Возможно, это мой пузырь или просто личное мнение, но видеть как большой бренд генерит видео через нейросетку — это ёбаный испанский стыд. Ребят, деньги

42❤‍🔥17💯9👎2

28 Jan 2026, 08:51 UTC≈3,070 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я в поиске работы или парт-тайм проектов После года в Кинопоиске и трех лет в 1Fit ищу работу по следующим позициям: Head of Content Head of SMM UX-Editor В 1Fit я отвечал за tone of voice, тексты интерфейсов, лендинги, рассылки, а на старте работы — за спецпроекты и соцсети. Менеджерил команду переводчиков, с которыми за год перевели приложение на 7 языков. А еще придумал ту самую рекламу «Обожаю плавать!» (извини

53🔥15

25 Sept 2025, 04:14 UTC≈3,920 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Гоу, я создал Новый канал, где буду собирать примеры нейрохрючева или, как это по-заморски говорят, AI-slop → @aipoebota Не секрет, что я хейчу использование нейросетей. Особенно со стороны больших брендов. Каждый раз дёргается глаз, когда прохожу мимо наружки, где изображен персонаж, вызывающий эффект зловещей долины Создал чисто по фану, чтобы документировать всю эту ересь, наблюдать и осмыслять её развитие Пл

18❤‍🔥5😈4💊3

24 Sept 2025, 08:57 UTC≈2,980 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Отдельно хочу сказать, что те люди, которые искренне радовались смерти Чарли Кирка — ебучие нелюди, за которыми нужен пристальный присмотр По большей части это леваки на западе, у которых, видимо, атрофированы простейшие человеческие ценности по типу «Не убивать людей, с которыми ты не согласен» У нас наверняка тоже есть подобные карго-культисты, у которых примерно один мозг на троих, но что с них долбаёбов взять,

13👍5💯4😍3❤‍🔥2😘1

24 Sept 2025, 08:50 UTC≈2,070 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Джимми Киммел вернулся в эфир Неделю назад его шоу отменили и убрали с канала после того, как он высказался о трагичной гибели консервативного спикера Чарли Кирка Давайте пройдёмся по таймлайну: 10 сентября 2025 года В Чарли Кирка убивают выстрелом из винтовки перед студентами Университета долины Юты 11 сентября 2025 года Джимми Киммел публикует пост, где выражает соболезнования по поводу гибели Чарли 17 сентябр

17💯5💩4❤‍🔥3🤝3👍2🍌1🤯1

16 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTC≈1,690 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Получилось дочитать?

  1. Я пока на середине12%
  2. Не читал, но осуждаю36%
  3. Хороший рассказ, поучительный26%
  4. Фильм лучше26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🍌5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ramiz_txt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTCAnonymous Poll164 voters

Получилось дочитать?

  1. Я пока на середине12%
  2. Не читал, но осуждаю36%
  3. Хороший рассказ, поучительный26%
  4. Фильм лучше26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aviasales.kz
@AAAVIASALESKZ · 63,477
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
Nomad Soul
@nomadsoul · 53,964
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,535
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рамиз.txt” (@ramiz_txt), 1,819 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramiz_txt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.