Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RANDOM BATTLE 🔥

Channel

RANDOM BATTLE 🔥

@random_battle_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002107449862
TypeChannel
Username@random_battle_official
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/random_battle_official

Growth

1541781667 August 2026 — 154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 154 subscribers15 August 2026 — 158 subscribers23 August 2026 — 164 subscribers30 August 2026 — 167 subscribers9 September 2026 — 178 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:17178+11
30 Aug 2026, 13:07167+3
23 Aug 2026, 21:23164+6
15 Aug 2026, 16:05158+4
8 Aug 2026, 19:00154no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:23154first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5364.6%
🔥1417.1%
👍56.10%
😁33.66%
22.44%
💯22.44%
🗿11.22%
🤩11.22%
🥱11.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC54 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто победил ?

  1. RADIANT79%
  2. MINIPIN21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC60 viewsread 8 August 2026

RANDOM 2RNAMENT - RADIANT VS MINIPIN (CLASSIC A-CAPELLA) (PROMO) https://youtu.be/RL69EiFsl0A

4 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC77 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня новый бател Уже третий вторник подряд, но это выходит не специально, хотелось бы конечно на выходных Следующий попробуем уже в воскресенье дропнуть

🔥421👍1

2 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC103 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Лучшая заявка от рандомовских типов

  1. NIKE__TOS23%
  2. КОХАН0%
  3. UNKNOWN PERSON13%
  4. MOLODOY KAZAKH23%
  5. KRISTOF8%
  6. MC DI-ASKA8%
  7. QIDAY!13%
  8. Может чью то еще вы видели ? В коментах напишите15%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

QIDAY! - Заявка на КУБОК МЦ HUNT https://youtu.be/jjocdDdivd0?si=s-LmchyUU4jrOezm

4

1 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

КОХАН - Заявка на КУБОК МЦ HUNT https://youtu.be/PaVHL-K7Gms?si=dm7k0Bl3wT43IsMz

5

1 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC98 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

UNKNOWN PERSON - Заявка на КУБОК МЦ HUNT https://youtube.com/shorts/z9q1tCTy7Cs?si=Lcyodk0a9cxKnfYb

5

1 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC95 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NIKE__TOS - Заявка на КУБОК МЦ HUNT https://youtu.be/XlD5IP7jRm4

6🔥1🤩1🥱1

31 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Йооооу а вот и фотоотчет с прошлого мероприятия подъехал, фотки очень сочные получились, как и баттлы🔥🔥🔥 https://vk.com/album-207155264_309981043

51🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/f1S1sQLrPr4?si=0CODhH5FjnDebkih

2

30 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Йоу йоу йоу, а у нас там дальше ребятки сдают заявочки на кубок мц И это сдал уже тоже наш участник турнира KRISTOF, как вам ? Думаете пройдет ?

2

28 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC127 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто победил ?

  1. RADIANT36%
  2. ГАИТОВ64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @random_battle_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Кто победил ?

  1. RADIANT79%
  2. MINIPIN21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Лучшая заявка от рандомовских типов

  1. NIKE__TOS23%
  2. КОХАН0%
  3. UNKNOWN PERSON13%
  4. MOLODOY KAZAKH23%
  5. KRISTOF8%
  6. MC DI-ASKA8%
  7. QIDAY!13%
  8. Может чью то еще вы видели ? В коментах напишите15%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Кто победил ?

  1. RADIANT36%
  2. ГАИТОВ64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RANDOM BATTLE 🔥” (@random_battle_official), 178 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/random_battle_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.