Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,280–2,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:21
2,287
-1
14 Sept 2026, 23:17
2,288
+1
11 Sept 2026, 09:57
2,287
-1
6 Sept 2026, 06:59
2,288
-10
2 Sept 2026, 00:44
2,298
-1
30 Aug 2026, 09:28
2,299
-3
27 Aug 2026, 08:18
2,302
-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:57
2,303
-8
20 Aug 2026, 04:27
2,311
-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:04
2,317
-10
13 Aug 2026, 16:28
2,327
-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:13
2,330
-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:55
2,331
-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:18
2,333
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:51
2,333
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
4m 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
218
51.1%
❤
103
24.1%
🔥
33
7.73%
👏
32
7.49%
🤬
19
4.45%
🤡
11
2.58%
👎
4
0.937%
🥴
3
0.703%
🥰
2
0.468%
🖕
1
0.234%
🤔
1
0.234%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2024 to 8 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WE NEED A DOGE, NOT A FORD On February 27th will you buy the corrupt broken down Ford, or will you choose a reliable, dependable and trustworthy replacement.
Become a candidate contact me at [email protected]
Become a member and help out at www.Ontarioparty.ca
Lets TAKE BACK ONTARIO https://youtu.be/W2BbCi2zsgs
https://youtu.be/kPUwQrfDCEA WILL YOU TAKE BACK ONTARIO?
Join us at the http://OntarioParty.ca to Take Back our once great province.
We are actively recruiting candidates and volunteers to join us. Contact [email protected] to become part of a team dedicated to ensuring the future of all Ontarians and fighting against the destruction and devastation we have been experiencing through mass migration, homelessness…
https://youtu.be/Ke1y8K6P9Bs MAID in Ontario Made in Ontario doesn't mean what it used to in Ontario. @fordnation & @JustinTrudeau have MAID life a living H**L for people.
On February 27th we can
TAKE BACK ONTARIO
with @TrueDerekSloan @TomMarazzo & @randyhillier
Contact http://ontarioparty.ca Become a candidate contact info@randyhillier
A Fork in road-which path will we take?
On February 27th Canadians face a critical juncture-will we stay on the path of corruption and darkness, or will we choosea new path towards Hope Town.
Join the www.OntarioParty.ca with @trueDerekSloan, @TomMarazzo and myself @randyhillier
TAKE BACK ONTARIO
https://youtu.be/pvSuwKM8IDI
https://youtu.be/S4ye9SrTFc0 Take Back Ontario!
Corrupt political parties have ruled over us for too long. On February 27th 2025 we can end this cycle of corruption.
Join with
@RandyHillier
, @TrueDereksSloan and join the http://Ontarioparty.ca to Take Back Ontario.
MAJOR Announcement- Hillier Joins Ontario party in senior leadership role
Premier Ford and Prime Minister Trudeau are habitual and repeat offenders.
On Sunday January 27th 2025 Derek Sloan, Leader of the Ontario Party announced that former MPP Randy Hillier has joined our leadership team as Co Campaign Chairman for the upcoming Ontario general election.
Now, as we face another election, we have an opportunity to un…
The Maple Leaf-is it being used as a false flag?
Canada A user's guide and owners manual episode 11
Can we use referenda to fix our country with @PardyBruce , @wabbitwarrior & Marty Speyer
What is obvious is that our Canadian political elite will defend and prioritize rampant and uncontrolled immigration that dilutes our Canadian heritage at the expense of Canadians economic well-being.
Trump is fixing America a…
https://youtu.be/1W6FZ8tqzu0 51 st State. We have been governed by Crooks & Carney's for too long
Donald Trump wants to annex Canada - would this be good for Canadians?
I'll be discussing this and Canada's current identity crisis with Greg Wycliffe tonight January 15th at 7pm EST LIVE LINK 👇👇 https://youtube.com/live/-Ay3ddq4Lbg?feature=share
Also on X
@randyhillier
and Facebook
@RandyHillier
https://youtu.be/wwuvykaMxoQ 51st State Debate
What is a Canadian-Should we become AmeriCans?
X space hosted by @NML_Canada
8pm easten Monday January 13th
I will be co-hosting an open X space tonight 51st State Debate.
What is a Canadian-Should we be AmeriCans?
Join the discussion and debate
https://x.com/i/spaces/1BRJjwPbojexw
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @randyhillier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@randyhillier named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tommarazzo named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fordnation named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@justintrudeau named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mikeschreiner named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nml_canada named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ottawapolice named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pardybruce named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@davefreedom6 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@truederekssloan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@johnfraseros named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Randy Hillier Channel” (@randyhillier), 2,287 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/randyhillier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.