Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фил Ранжин

Channel

Фил Ранжин

@ranzhin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,429subscribers

+64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002340972793
TypeChannel
Username@ranzhin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ranzhin

Growth

2,3632,4292,3966 August 2026 — 2,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,363 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,377 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,388 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,382 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,381 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,395 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,411 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,419 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,429 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,353–2,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 13:412,429+10
5 Sept 2026, 18:562,419+8
1 Sept 2026, 19:532,411+16
30 Aug 2026, 04:462,395+14
27 Aug 2026, 01:552,381-1
23 Aug 2026, 15:542,382-10
20 Aug 2026, 03:412,392+4
17 Aug 2026, 11:082,388+11
13 Aug 2026, 16:172,377+14
7 Aug 2026, 03:542,363-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:482,365no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:522,365first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

541 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10419.2%
🤡9617.7%
👍6111.3%
😁6111.3%
549.98%
💯519.43%
💊173.14%
🐳122.22%
101.85%
🥱101.85%
👏81.48%
🤣71.29%
👌61.11%
👎61.11%
🖕50.924%
🤔50.924%
😢40.739%
💔30.555%
🗿30.555%
🤷‍♂30.555%
11 further kinds152.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ranzhin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC591 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @myobrechenychannel

Так, сейчас с вами поговорит Фил. Точнее даже больше, чем Фил — целый Филипп нахуй. Меня тут упрекнули, что я оторвался от реальности, давно не работаю в айти, и ничего не понимаю в ваших проблемах, а ешё берусь чё-то там на подкасте вякать Честно — задело. Я и правда уже не плоть от плоти индустрии, я не начинаю свой день с говнодейлика, не перетаскиваю тикеты из одного столбца в другой, не спорю в рабочем чатике,

👍14🤡4🤔21😱1

4 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC943 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @onabokaPhoto

Ну все, записали еще один выпуск с Мы обречены, перетерли косточки рынку труда и новому джоб-стартапу Ханти

7🔥5🥱4💊2

2 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈2,120 views144 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Любители линуксов здесь? Идите на хуй! Уж на что винда и макось говнище, но как же им далеко в уёбищности до этой срани Понимаете ли, ос это такая штука, о которой ты вообще в идеале и знать не должен. Она не решает тебе никаких задач, она нужна штукам, которые решают тебе задачи Вот у меня есть мессенджер, чтобы я мог отправлять сообщения, есть проводник, чтобы я управлялся с файлами, есть приложение банка, чтобы

🤡66😁34🐳12💯12💊7👏4🤔3❤‍🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,210 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вы не готовы к этому разговору, но Практически всё программное обеспечение в мире — полнейшее говно Можно и нужно делать намного лучше, но никого это не волновало, не волнует, и не будет волновать В айти делать медленную, неудобную, тяжёлую, бесполезную хуергу — базовая норма Злюсь в новом видосе, присоединяйтесь https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E97pQhMdeRs

🔥18💯6👌51🤡1😡1

29 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,960 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Проболтали пару часов про внезапно джаву Зацените! https://youtu.be/kHGOy4PmmVU

🔥6🤷‍♂21🍾1👍1

27 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,060 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Многие проекты начались потому что талантливый разраб решил, что больше не хочет работать на дядю, поверил в себя и в гениальность своего видения и рискнул… Так начинается моя рекламная подводка на тему управления бизнесом, оптимизации и автоматизации процессов. Скучная тема, но честно без нее никуда. Если не будете искать решения, которые упростят вам работу и сэкономят драгоценное время, далеко не уедете/выгорите/

🤡14🔥43🗿3

24 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,830 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @onceaponajew

Погнали) https://youtu.be/14N3l5_reco?si=4bzTFatHwChC7kRI

5👎4🤡3👍1

21 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,210 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новояз новояз, и смешно и грустно https://labs.frkn.org/reelsoprovod

👍42👎2🖕2

21 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC≈2,260 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У нас тут новьё, зацените https://youtu.be/_WcGSPyp6Cg

🔥143👍2

20 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC≈2,240 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вообще помогите-ка мне тут с подготовкой к одной важной хуерге Расскажите про самый хуёвый софт в вашей жизни

👍8

20 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC≈2,460 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чисто опыт чувака, единственная работа которого — трещать с айтишниками на камеру: Хуже всего сейчас фронтендерам. Труднее всего найти работу, хуже зарплаты, сокращения и полное отсутствие какого-то плана Я бы позлорадствовал, но вообще-то у меня дела ещё хуже, так что — обождёт Хотя причин позлорадствовать хватает: долгие годы фронты были с огромным отрывом самой раздражающей частью айти Они заполонили все конфы

🔥33💯11💊75🤣5🤡4👍2🤝1

16 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈5,140 views38 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Эй ай сподвижники у меня уже в печёнках сидят Сидеть, и ждать сложа руки, пока они сами наконец навайбкодят себя за щеку я не собираюсь А вместо этого я снял видос про то, что они все до единого — долбоёбы, и не лечатся, пока я один стою в белом пальто В общем, я свою работу сделал, теперь вы сделайте свою — просмотр лайк комент подписка Погнали! https://youtu.be/AY3OhBjv0hg

👍18🔥10🖕3🎉2😁21💊1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ranzhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фил Ранжин” (@ranzhin), 2,429 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ranzhin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.