Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RAP GEMS

Channel

RAP GEMS

@rapgems

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,863subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001890717786
TypeChannel
Username@rapgems
DescriptionВопросы/реклама – @gems_ads Новость – @rapgemsnews ссылка для друзей — https://t.me/+VputrqV22uE4ZGQ6
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rapgems

Growth

7,8637,9577,9107 August 2026 — 7,957 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,957 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,945 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,933 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,919 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,899 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,878 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,863 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,849–7,971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 18:177,863-15
24 Aug 2026, 17:057,878-21
20 Aug 2026, 21:247,899-20
17 Aug 2026, 14:297,919-14
14 Aug 2026, 10:287,933-12
10 Aug 2026, 23:067,945-12
7 Aug 2026, 12:167,957no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:097,957first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
939
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held24 (28 June 202626 August 2026)
Views total11,269
Reactions total170
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,060
Videos
2,190
Links
2,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 50s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

532 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36468.4%
🔥6812.8%
🤡478.83%
💩275.08%
101.88%
💔101.88%
🤯61.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 24 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rapgems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC369 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

а концерт канье по итогу состоится ил не я не понимаю

11💔2🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🎙 ХИТЫ BUSHIDO ZHO ЗАЗВУЧАЛИ В СОВСЕМ ИНОМ ФОРМАТЕ На вечеринке «Сила Звука» рэперы решили выйти за привычные рамки - треки переиграли под латину и реггетон. У Бушидо Жо услышали в новой обработке «SOS», «Але? Ало» и «Veuve Clicquot», а Mayot — «Клип» и «Звезда упала». Компанию на сцене им составили Gorilla Glu, Lil Naku, Uglystephan, Алёна Швец, Bato и остальной лайнап вечера. ❤️ — свежо, эксперимент удался RAP

11🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC784 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @lilflaassh2Photo

Lil Flash$ - DILEMMA https://aurora-records.band.link/HB24n cover: @env1one mix/master: @pradakiddd

9💩4🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC989 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺 LIL PUMP ЗАЯВИЛ, ЧТО РАД ВЕРНУТЬСЯ В РОССИЮ Артист прокомментировал свой приезд — сказал, что скучал по стране и с теплом относится к местной публике. Российским фанатам на предстоящем концерте он пообещал настоящее веселье — судя по всему, шоу готовят с размахом. ❤️ — Памп красавчик, ждём концерт RAP GEMS 💎

22🔥32

19 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC907 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚫 LIDA ЗАДЕРЖАЛИ ПЕРЕД КОНЦЕРТОМ В ВОЛГОГРАДЕ На артиста поступила ориентировка по подозрению в употреблении запрещённых веществ. Полицейские заставили его пройти тест на месте. Результат оказался чист — после проверки Лиду отпустили. Сам артист позже пошутил, что не мог сдать анализ около 40 минут из-за того, что все смотрели. ❤️ — не сомневался в лиде 🤡 — ему повезло просто RAP GEMS 💎

14🔥3💩1🤡1

19 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC990 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Lil Pump возвращается в Россию! 22 августа легенда новой школы хип-хопа даст первый большой сольный концерт в VK Stadium. Автор хитов Gucci Gang, Boss, Eskeetit и I Love It с Канье Уэстом стал одним из главных символов SoundCloud-рэпа и изменил современный хип-хоп. В Москве Lil Pump исполнит свои главные бэнгеры, а также представит новый альбом Lil Pump 3, который выйдет всего за несколько дней до концерта. Гото

9🔥32

11 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,230 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🌴 ЗВУК СОБЕРЁТ ПОЛОВИНУ РЭП-СЦЕНЫ НА ОДНОЙ ВЕЧЕРИНКЕ В СТИЛЕ ЛАТИНЫ 20 августа музыкальный сервис Звук проведёт «Силу Звука» — артисты исполнят свои хиты в аранжировках латины и реггетона. В лайнапе: Bushido Zho, Mayot, Алёна Швец, Uglystephan, Gorilla Glu, Lil Naku, Nextime, Пазнякс и Bato. 📍 Веранда клуба «Оригинал», Москва, ул. Земляной Вал, 9А 🗓 Сбор гостей — 19:00. Попасть можно бесплатно через прослушивание

7💩1

8 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,080 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🗓 АЛЬБОМ LIL FLASH$ ПОЛУЧИЛ ДАТУ ВЫХОДА — «DILEMMA» ВЫЙДЕТ 21 АВГУСТА Промо-кампания уже началась — билборды и проекции с символикой альбома засветились сразу в нескольких городах, включая Бангкок, Киев, Москву и Париж. ❤️ — размах серьёзный, ждём альбом RAP GEMS 💎

12🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC984 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ihate2bVideo

bout u 07.08 pre-save link directed & dp by eagle_.mp4 assist teuusssss mel.ssandre dollbaebka7 mua sproutedsins styled by me

3🔥3🤯3

1 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,140 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

❌ ВСЕ УСТАЛИ ОТ НЕЙРОСЛОПА Ежедневно на Spotify заливают десятки тысяч треков и почти половина из них — нейросетевая. Кажется, слушатели уже наелись. Недавно стриминг еще и начал ставить тег «AI» в описании трека среди перечисления продюсеров и авторов. Решение, похоже на Spotify DNA, когда ты хочешь узнать больше о том, как он был создан и при помощи каких инструментов. 🔥 — Скоро ИИ станет инструментом, а не маст

🔥84💩2🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @rapgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,209,998 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РЭП СМИ
@rapsmi · 58,514
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RAP GEMS” (@rapgems), 7,863 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rapgems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.